News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.3K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

  1. G

    Markham Place Condos (VHL Developments) - Real Estate -

    Markham Place, Building B, 8 Rosebank Dr, M1B 0A1 it is phase ii and the occupancy date was originally summer 2009, then extended to June 20 2010, now again it is extended to OCT 1 2010. hopefully this is the last extension. That was what I was asking. This is the second extenxion and they...
  2. G

    Markham Place Condos (VHL Developments) - Real Estate -

    I got a notice letting e know that the tentative date of occupancy has been extended to OCT 1 2010. This is the second extension. The first one was from July 31 2009 to June 21 2010. What surprised me is that the phrase "subject to our rights to further extend the Occupancy Date...". Are they...
  3. G

    Markham Place (Markham & Sheppard, VHL Dev, 2x 16s) COMPLETE

    Did anybody see the interior? I am curious! The outside does not look like the "artist's impression" given to me...:o
  4. G

    Markham Place Condos (VHL Developments) - Real Estate -

    I bought in Jan 2008. That time the OD was set for summer 2009. Yes, I did get a notice that the OD for Phase II would be Spring 2010. But if look on the website they changed to summer 2010. With all these experiences, I am skeptical that it would be ready even for summer 2010. I would say fall...
  5. G

    Markham Place Condos (VHL Developments) - Real Estate -

    Thanks for your reply. I can not really say what is being changed in the interior. They pushed the occupancy date of bldg 2 to summer 2010 so I am looking to it still from the outside...:). I hope someone who bought a suite in the east bldg will share the information with us.
  6. G

    Markham Place Condos (VHL Developments) - Real Estate -

    "ON TIME"? Man the occupancy date for phase one bldg was summer 2008 and for phase 2 was summer 2009. In addition, I have never seen a builder make so many changes to the original design. It does not seem to be fair. BTW is it usual to extend the occupancy date for more than a year and change...

Back
Top