I kinda disagree. The architect trades off on design to be "sensitive" to the heritage and the heritage basically is destroyed. The City should allow additional floors on the condition the heritage is better preserved or have the developer pay for removing the heritage which hopefully results...

The design is pure facadism and not even sensitive (see 426 University Ave). The architect might be able to design a better building without the building there and they are not really preserving any of the heritage. They are even chopping off the cornice line. Why not cut the heritage building...

At that point, why bother keeping anything of the building?!

Used everywhere? The detailing is sleek. The way it meets the glass is minimal. The flush and slight-recessed change is dynamic enough to break up the facade too.

The glass gives me life and the panels look sharp.

Layers of time

Little boxes in the south core... and they turned out all the same ?

From Canoe

Not exactly sure where to post these photos! October 2016 May 2018 August 2018 May 2019

Yesterday