Exactly. The issue again being the contractor and the theatre group are just avoiding it. So much misleading and guided information from the theatre Roxy camp out there. It would be beneficial to have the south building made whole by addressing the damages they cause so they can move past it...

Cowards tend to turn away when they have nothing to say. This is what I expected.

All I’ve done is point out their error.

You do see where the original poster fell short right? Or is this a circle jerk of nepotism and half baked attempts to disparage people you don’t know? Should I have not stumbled upon this and expressed my thoughts?

I did. The commenters attempt at “comedy” did the exact opposite they intended. They’ve implied that blackmail has held up the work. So has the adjacent building owner been involved sexually with a hooker, preteen, flock or sheep and something to do with fentanyl… So if the Roxy was...

Your statement implies the adjacent building owner is blackmailing someone in the Theatre network for having sex with a hooker, sheep and a teenager? And has something to do with fentanyl?