News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
  1. W

    Edmonton City Centre Mall (Renovations) | ?m | 2s | LaSalle Investment Management

    ^So, the return-to-work mandate appears to be having some ripple effects? Thanks to the private sector and the province for picking up the slack where the city does not take the lead. Shameful. Utterly a fail on part of City Hall.
  2. W

    LRT Safety

    bu bu but... their traaauuma! Must give them as much leeway as possible because, well... (someone care to explain?!)
  3. W

    Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton

    ^ I then, respectfully, retract my statement related to that. But, will add, knowing now that (some) councillors take transit and still are not coming up with something more to deal with ALL the woes that still exist is truly appalling. For councillors to take transit and see the disgusting...
  4. W

    Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton

    You do realize if it brings social disorder et al along with it, that will be the 'transformation' that people will talk about.
  5. W

    Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton

    ^^I don't know what that means. If you're trying to belittle me, just be straight-forward about it. And to all who are shaking their heads and wanting to down vote my comments, then what - aside from blaming the province - is your solution? Because - for worse - the UCP is what is in charge...
  6. W

    Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton

    ^and the circle of inaction continues. You're making excuses. I'm calling for action from city hall under the reality of the current variables the city faces. That requires bold leadership; perhaps some controversial-to-some actions. Until that happens - the suburbs, outside the Henday, look...
  7. W

    Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton

    What action is the city supposed to take? How about a zero-tolerance approach. This is not about 'targeting' the vulnerable. There are plenty who are living rough who are not bothering anyone. But why, for gods sake, are we as a society allowing open air drug use? How about calling out the...
  8. W

    Valley Line LRT | TransEd/Marigold | City of Edmonton

    God, the Valley line DT is such a mess. 'Take transit' City Hall says. I say, 'You first, Mayor and Councillors' - daily, with no entourage. Let's see what would happen then. The truth is, nothing is going to change. The city will blame the province, the province will sit on its hands and...
  9. W

    General Infill Discussion

    Well, based on SO MANY of the original historic buildings that went up in this city (which were then all torn down), I'd say you're 100% wrong. And in the current day, based for example, on how nice Stadium Yards worked out, it's another example where you're wrong with your statement.
  10. W

    General Infill Discussion

    minimum window sizes, use of only select materials etc. i mean, my goodness, it doesn't even have to be administratively bureaucratic. create an AI model with the minimum standards outlined, submit the design and have the AI determine if it gets the pass or not. If it does not, then have the...
  11. W

    Downtown Crime

    ^Don't be so glib. It doesn't help the issue. As far as most people are concerned, the Alex is the city's downtown adjacent hospital. The zombieland that is 101st next to the Alex leads to DT. It's all part and parcel. Perception is reality.
  12. W

    Downtown Crime

    Come downtown, they say! (Just be careful where you look or stand or who you make eye contact with)
  13. W

    General Infill Discussion

    Oh, please. A turd will always be a turd. Why can't you just acknowledge there is some very ugly infill going up? And what is wrong with having (and enforcing) some design standards? This is the problem with ideological-driven thinking. Failure to look at the faults. Perhaps you're...
  14. W

    Municipal Politics

    Think this is a good spot for this: Suburbs are going to happen. So why doesn't anyone in the urbanist community push for a better designed suburb? I'm looking at you, City Hall.
  15. W

    City Infrastructure Maintenance

    See. The defensive posture you just took doesn't solve the issue. Why is calling out the challenges the city faces put some with their backs up? And leaving it at 'good enough' or 'that's who we are' is not good enough. Edmonton is an affluent city in an affluent province in a G7 country...
  16. W

    City Infrastructure Maintenance

    I am so tempted to just only complain. But, instead, I would like to ask for solutions here. Walking and driving around, one can't help notice the appalling deterioration of city infrastructure. Examples: - potholes everywhere (I know it's a situation related to our weather, but why do...
  17. W

    General Infill Discussion

    Ok, see how that place looks in 5/ 10/ 20 years. And there's a difference between a massive infill that's not maintained/ looks ugly vs a SFH. If it's just one house, it's a blip on the block. If it's a large-scale infill like this and it looks ugly, not maintained - it will make the entire...
  18. W

    LRT Safety

    The transit system should be only a transit system, not a mobile homeless shelter or harm reduction site. It's allowing actions like this to fester that turn good people to vote CONServatives. When will the progressive left get that?!
  19. W

    General Infill Discussion

    My god, that's ugly AF! All one needs is one example like this for why people push back against infill. Those are all clearly revenue generation properties. The landscaping will be a bare minimal and there will be no 'ownership' into the community,. Might as well put up some portables and...
  20. W

    The Parks | 146.91m | 45s | 35s | 13s | Pangman | Hariri Pontarini

    The elegance of this building it great. From multiple angles. This tower will age gracefully. The city should work with the developer to see what can be done to get the second tower going. (outside of blatant taxpayer subsidies)

Back
Top