Tothewest
Active Member
I dont think it's accepting "ugly", that's a person's opinion, i'm saying I think some people have wildly unrealistic expectations of how to convert a concrete heavy design era commercial building into residential, that doesnt involve an large amount of external deconstruction...which unfortunately is a fast way to discourage investment.If you see this proposal as really ugly than
I disagree on accepting ugly by blaming the 1970s and 1980s or that It's better than the 50 year old derelict structure. People including those today settling for a C+ (which I would say is generous) will be staring up puzzled by such an eyesore in 20 years time and up until it's destroyed. D minuses and Fs are upgraded to As and B pluses all the time.
Better design comes at a higher price but, it doesn't have to be that much. Also demand for the cheapest cladding raises their costs so we end up with manufacturers coming up with even cheaper composites ready for landfill in 10 to 20 years.
I am by no means saying I love this design, its very average...but I try to find the wins in the intent behind this conversion movement. That it is less about design, and more about proper land use, density, ect...