UrbanWarrior
Senior Member
This was widely discussed on SSP like 4 years ago. I'm surprised everyone here is so... surprised... about this one.
I don't remember this being at SSP, but I haven't been there for much over the last two years. I stopped going there early 2016.
Edit. Call me dumb, as I took a look and sure enough it was there on SSP, and posted by none other than myself April 17, 2015 lol.
I don't remember this being at SSP, but I haven't been there for much over the last two years. I stopped going there early 2016.
Edit. Call me dumb, as I took a look and sure enough it was there on SSP, and posted by none other than myself April 17, 2015 lol.
This was widely discussed on SSP like 4 years ago. I'm surprised everyone here is so... surprised... about this one.
Would the proximity to the river limit the height? And if that is the case, you have to make up the FAR by going wider.I wish the towers were 15% slimmer and taller. I don't mind the podium. It's very monotonous. That's fine for Toronto which has an abundance of varied retail streetscapes throughout its downtown. They need to try a little harder here.
Great Gulf trolls you at the site, as for the last few years (since they purchased the land) they've had a billboard up there showing three of their much taller GTA area condos. Still fools me every now and then.
I would guess it would be right up around that mark. Riverfront Pointe is 20 floors, and probably just makes it under the shadow bylaw.Agree. At 24 storeys they have to pretty close to the shadowing limit.