maestro
Senior Member
No.
Yeah, agreed. Honestly I don't see what's wrong with it. A slightly different colour scheme than we're used to, and everyone hates it?I never thought I'd say this, but the blue is starting to grow on me. What started as a shitshow of surprises and poor management might become a distinctive bit of colour in our skyline.
I never thought I'd say this, but the blue is starting to grow on me. What started as a shitshow of surprises and poor management might become a distinctive bit of colour in our skyline.
Yeah, agreed. Honestly I don't see what's wrong with it. A slightly different colour scheme than we're used to, and everyone hates it?
I would much rather have that than the plethora of bland white/concrete buildings from the 70's and 80's.
To each his own I suppose.I wouldn't call it a nice shade of blue and being different from the rest of the towers doesn't make up for the ugly, cheap looking cladding.
I actually didn't ask.O kay?
It doesn't keep me up at night either.
You did ask.
I very much agree with Always_Biking.I'm ambivalent about the blue on Live at Park. Some people really can't stand it, but it bothers me much less than the massing on Vantage Point or the beige stucco of Discovery Pointe.
Come on guys, this isn't SSP. Let's try to keep passive aggressiveness down. I understand it's hard sometimes, definitely can be for me as well.
The Park certainly isn't the worst in town, but good lord it's nowhere near the best. I feel like a layman would look at it and think it looks good. It's a vibrant splash of colour in a highly visible location. Every person I've talked to about it (who aren't urban development enthusiasts) think it looks cool, other than the bunker-esque portion at the bottom.