News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.2K     0 

A

Are Be

Guest
Don't brake copyright laws!
Quote any article in full, inclduing the end, such as:
<www.thestar.com/images/st...pacer.gif>
<www.thestar.com/images/st...pacer.gif>
FAQs| Site Map| Privacy Policy| Webmaster| Subscribe| My Subscription
Home| GTA| Business| Waymoresports| A&E| Life
Legal Notice:- Copyright 1996-2003. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form.
OK, may still be breaching the law, but-- at least indicate properly your sources!
 
There really is no difference, Are Be. If you post the copyright info at the bottom, all you are doing is saying "Look at me, I'm a bloody hypocrite! I'm breaking the law but I'm telling everyone else to not do what I did."

Its pointless clutter. If you are concerned with the legality of posting articles from newspaper sites, I would recommend you stop posting them. That said, a newspaper wouldn't be interested in prosecuting people who were showcasing their material. They would only be interested if people were passing it off as their own material, or trying to use it in a commercial application (i.e., another website, especially one with banner advertising).
 
Um...
Think of it as an essay, and you need a correct footnote.
Pasting in the entire 'printer' version tends to cover any copyright considertations.
 
Are Be:

Actually, no - some materials are not supposed to be posted in any event, irregardless of whether you cite it or not.

GB
 
there are provisions in the law for research, etc.- for which this forum may qualify-- however, you need to properly identify the copyright holder. By pasting in the entirety of a 'printer friendly' version the copyright issues are -generally speaking- taken care of.
Research is OK and fair game.
 
Canadian Encyclopedic Digest
Copyright
XIV -- Lawful Use of Copyright Works
2 -- Fair Dealing

Copyright © CARSWELL,
a Division of Thomson Canada Ltd. or its Licensors. All rights reserved.


§253
Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright.[FN1] In order to take advantage of the "private study" exception the individual involved must have made the copies or engaged in the otherwise infringing activity personally.[FN2] Educational institutions or their staff do not come within the exception[FN3] but a library, archive or museum or a person acting under its authority may take advantage of the exception.[FN4]
254
Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism[FN1] or review does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned: the source; and if given in the source, the name of the author, in the case of a work, performer, in the case of a performer's performance, maker, in the case of a sound recording, or broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.[FN2]
255
Fair dealing for the purpose of news reporting does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned: the source; and if given in the source, the name of the author, in the case of a work, performer, in the case of a performer's performance, maker, in the case of a sound recording, or broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.[
256
In order to come within these exceptions the use by the defendant must be fair. What will constitute fair dealing depends on the facts of each case. [FN1] The motive of the defendant,[FN2] the amount of the work taken, [FN3] and whether the two works are likely to be competing[FN4] are important factors. The custom in the particular trade or industry involved may be relevant.[FN5] The fact that a work has not been published does not by itself preclude the application of the defence. However, this will be another factor to be considered.[FN6] The absence of a notice forbidding copying does not affect the plaintiff's rights.[FN7]
 
nicetommy2002 raised a very, very good point!!! VERY WELL DONE!! Very good point!
Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.
WOW! WE MUST, MUST QUOTE THE COPYRIGHT BLURB ALL THE TIME!!!
Even if we do, we might be breaking the law, but if we don't, quote the copyright blurb, we no doubt ARE breaking the law!
Canadian Encyclopedic Digest
Copyright
XIV -- Lawful Use of Copyright Works
2 -- Fair Dealing

Copyright © CARSWELL,
a Division of Thomson Canada Ltd. or its Licensors. All rights reserved.


§253
Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright.[FN1] In order to take advantage of the "private study" exception the individual involved must have made the copies or engaged in the otherwise infringing activity personally.[FN2] Educational institutions or their staff do not come within the exception[FN3] but a library, archive or museum or a person acting under its authority may take advantage of the exception.[FN4]
254
Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism[FN1] or review does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned: the source; and if given in the source, the name of the author, in the case of a work, performer, in the case of a performer's performance, maker, in the case of a sound recording, or broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.[FN2]
255
Fair dealing for the purpose of news reporting does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned: the source; and if given in the source, the name of the author, in the case of a work, performer, in the case of a performer's performance, maker, in the case of a sound recording, or broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.[
256
In order to come within these exceptions the use by the defendant must be fair. What will constitute fair dealing depends on the facts of each case. [FN1] The motive of the defendant,[FN2] the amount of the work taken, [FN3] and whether the two works are likely to be competing[FN4] are important factors. The custom in the particular trade or industry involved may be relevant.[FN5] The fact that a work has not been published does not by itself preclude the application of the defence. However, this will be another factor to be considered.[FN6] The absence of a notice forbidding copying does not affect the plaintiff's rights.[FN7]
 
Yes Im sure the lawyers of the Star and the National Post are pouring over EzBoard posts so they can sue for copyright infringment. Are Be, why bring this old and tired topic up again? Have you run out of new articles to post? :lol
 

Back
Top