Keep in mind as well that (non-electric) bikes are allowed on the LRT at any time; I love using my bikes as a first-mile last-mile connection with the train, and it'll be really easy for you to do now that the path connects to the bikeway by NAIT.

I saw this at Clareview station this summer - I forgot to report it. Because according to ETS website, bikes are allowed at all times.

20240831_131930.jpg
 
Last edited:
This will be huge. Kingsway makes blatchford so much less accessible/aligned with its vision for a less car centric community. Biking and walking connections N/S are badly needed.
Having a grocery store and shopping centre at your doorstep makes you somehow more car dependent? What am I missing here… I fully agree that blatchford needs better connections. But Kingsway is not the problem. If you look at a map, Kingsway isn’t even directly south of blatchford…
 
Having a grocery store and shopping centre at your doorstep makes you somehow more car dependent? What am I missing here… I fully agree that blatchford needs better connections. But Kingsway is not the problem. If you look at a map, Kingsway isn’t even directly south of blatchford…
I think they're referring to Kingsway Blvd, which has very narrow sidewalks and huge intersections. I've biked it a couple of times and can attest that it is very unpleasant to do.
 
Yeah sorry, the street that the bike route is designated for. It’s 11 lanes of traffic PLUS a sea of asphalt parking lot to connect blatchford to superstore.

Most neighborhoods have that level of; or often better, walkability to their grocery stores. Like the only way this is less walkable I guess would be 0 sidewalk and a raised highway or something? Haha. It’s pretty tough for our premier “green, urban, walkable community”.

2D6D9E6A-DF95-4A7B-A6B8-EADC596E78D3.png
 
wonder what Blatchford's "15 minute" neighbourhood looks like. I'm sure things will improve but def will need people before retailers take a chance. Agree with tommyjo that the trek from somewhere in the Blatch to Superstore would be a non-starter for all but the desperate.
 
Last edited:
Yeah sorry, the street that the bike route is designated for. It’s 11 lanes of traffic PLUS a sea of asphalt parking lot to connect blatchford to superstore.

Most neighborhoods have that level of; or often better, walkability to their grocery stores. Like the only way this is less walkable I guess would be 0 sidewalk and a raised highway or something? Haha. It’s pretty tough for our premier “green, urban, walkable community”.

View attachment 610994

It's honestly amazing to me how often this point needs to be made. Crossing a huge arterial road and massive parking lot on foot is not something that almost anyone wants to make part of their habitual lifestyle. This is an extremely unpleasant way to get groceries.
 
^ And this is where ALL the blame lies on the city. For the life of me, I don't understand why they say they want people to take more transit and walk etc, and then keep on approving neighbourhood designs that are vehicle-dependent. Sure, there's more density. But when the urban design density attached to a power centre type retail area, most residents will take their car.

At an open house years ago, I asked why urban planners are not going back to the grid with main street retail. The non-sensical answer I got was baffling!

This can't be blamed on the province. City hall has full control on neighbourhood design.
 
City hall has full control on neighbourhood design
Sounds a little autocratic -- it is one of more than a dozen reasons why I dislike urban planning. The best neighborhoods in the world have grown organically or, at a minimum, assisted (and i use that word reluctantly) by municipal governments -- Edmonton's own best example of this is Old Strathcona.
 
^no, the best 'hoods are based on the grid style street pattern. (Like Old strathcona)
No matter how hard one tries to make Mill Woods walkable, for example, it will always be vehicle dominant due to its design.
Go back to the grid. The city has the power to do that and yet they don't and so their goals will never be achieved.
 
^ we agree! And who do you suppose was responsible for the rat maze designs of modern neighborhoods (all in the name of making them safer (supposedly) for inhabitants? Is that whirring sound Jane Jacobs spinning in her grave?
 
Keep in mind as well that (non-electric) bikes are allowed on the LRT at any time; I love using my bikes as a first-mile last-mile connection with the train, and it'll be really easy for you to do now that the path connects to the bikeway by NAIT.
Electric bikes are allowed on LRT from what I'm seeing on the ETS website:

https://www.edmonton.ca/ets/bikes-on-ets

https://www.edmonton.ca/ets/riding-ets#items


If it's true you can't bring an e-bike on LRT, that would definitely affect my decision to buy one which I am thinking of doing soon.
 
Yeah sorry, the street that the bike route is designated for. It’s 11 lanes of traffic PLUS a sea of asphalt parking lot to connect blatchford to superstore.

Most neighborhoods have that level of; or often better, walkability to their grocery stores. Like the only way this is less walkable I guess would be 0 sidewalk and a raised highway or something? Haha. It’s pretty tough for our premier “green, urban, walkable community”.

View attachment 610994
Bunch of pansies
 

Back
Top