SMayo
Active Member
From the link, renderings look pretty good although judging by the setting of the building I feel like its more of a placeholder rendering than anything else.
- Thread starter Daveography
- Start date
From the link, renderings look pretty good although judging by the setting of the building I feel like its more of a placeholder rendering than anything else.
EdmTrekker
Senior Member
Looking good so far.
dunno
Active Member
yay more grey...
TAS
Senior Member
So from audit meeting today, the first housing started construction in 2019, occupied in 2020. Four years later, there are now, at this point in time today, 84 townhome units occupied. By the end of the year, should be another 40ish occupied for around 120-125 units occupied.
CplKlinger
Senior Member
Other snippets I caught:
They have a signed agreement for one 4-6 storey building (presumably Crimson Cove's), with three others "just days" away from signing. Each will supposedly bring around 90 more units. Also, of the 195 townhouse lots being developed in Stage 6, they're in talks with a developer interested in developing 60 lots.
fjordgard
New Member
These points stood out to me as well. There was also a hint that some Housing Accelerator Fund money will be going towards projects in Blatchford. I have found that the Blatchford discussion seems to ignore the 4-6 storey part of the plan. That is what hasn't been started yet and that is what will bring the real density. If they can announce 3-4 of those projects by the end of the year, that's hundreds of units and should hopefully quiet some SFH talk.
One thing that also stood out - Admin pointed out that the plan has always been 30,000 people "living, working and learning" in Blatchford. I have always heard it as 30,000 residents. "Living, working and learning" is very different...
TAS
Senior Member
Definitely Sohi and Cartmell sounded the most concerned about the progress and info that was reported and not reported. City admin could not even answer how many units under construction right now - nothing like being prepared for a fairly obvious question.
The most positive was Stevenson and Paquette with regards to how things are going.
I wonder if this is one of the 90 unit buildings - which isn't an apartment, they are 3 townhome complexes. It's currently been on their website for a little while.
But the sign has been up for quite a while with not a single stake in the ground - yet.
BASE
Active Member
For what it's worth this article from 2019 says "Blatchford is designed to house to up to 30,000 people when complete. The aim is to make it a sustainable community with its own geothermal district energy facility." https://globalnews.ca/news/5102112/edmonton-blatchford-townhouse-builders/
fjordgard
New Member
I don’t think this is the development he was talking about. He said it would be a 4-6 storey. Then again, he said Encore was working on 4 units right now when I know they’ve poured foundations for at least 11 units in the last couple weeks so…
For what it’s worth, Stratosphere mentioned somewhere on their social media in the fall that they would be breaking ground this spring so we’ll see!
fjordgard
New Member
The original 2010 vision says this (according to the Blatchford website): “Blatchford will be home to up to 30,000 Edmontonians living, working and learning in a sustainable community that uses 100 percent renewable energy, is carbon neutral, significantly reduces its ecological footprint, and empowers residents to pursue a range of sustainable lifestyle choices.”
Sort of a mixed message - is it home for 30,000 people? Or does the 30,000 include people who work and learn there but live elsewhere?
Glenco
Senior Member
According to DS in order to qualify for funding from the feds new housing initiative the homes cannot be heated by natural gas. Of course this is a no go for her but that does make Blatchford eligible.
fjordgard
New Member
Councillor Wright also made a half-joke about Blatchford getting all the federal dollars they could before the law officially changes on provincial approval!
Coprolite
Active Member
Thing is, when the other half and I were house shopping, we found that the "deals" in deep suburbs weren't just sacrificing location. They were also sacrificing energy efficiency, build quality, legal secondary suites, etc, and anything that was really comparable but somewhere else was going to be not much of a deal.
buildings
Active Member
wish that someone would push for a section to be 5 over 1. I grew up in Toronto and am used to living over stores, though then, it was more 2 over 1 (no elevators). would be great to cluster them around the lrt station(s).
chrisvazquez7
Active Member
I believe there are lots on Alpha Blvd that are intended for mixed use. Hopefully we start to see a little “Main Street” develop.