What do you think of this project?


  • Total voters
    67
Not to mention that it was a win-win on ROI for public dollars.

If anything, we need more of these stories, not less.

Since this did work out well, I wonder why developers/downtown boosters didn't advocate for this same grant structure again, which didn't require the city to pay out any money from its budget.

Instead, when they came back to council for support, they focused on a grant per sq.ft and that didn't seem to be as favorable with council nor the public.
 
Since this did work out well, I wonder why developers/downtown boosters didn't advocate for this same grant structure again, which didn't require the city to pay out any money from its budget.

Instead, when they came back to council for support, they focused on a grant per sq.ft and that didn't seem to be as favorable with council nor the public.
IMO, probably not a good time to ask the city, which is financially strapped and already having to increase taxes more than it knows citizens can bear, for money.

I suppose, if they don't like the answer, they can always try again, but unless the above noted fundamentals change I feel that would probably be a waste of time.
 
My understanding is that there was a XX$sqft that was palatable and on the table, but folks got a little greedy.
 
Gdk9fojXIAARPDt


 

10023 - 104 STREET NW Plan 2320719 Blk 3 Lot 67A - Major Development Permit​

External ID
550028441-002
Job Type
Major Development Permit
Description
Alteration of (an) existing building(s), Change of Use / Interior Alterations
Applicant
DHUNNA ASSOCIATES INC.
Status
Intake Review
Class of Permit

Create Date
December 16, 2024
Approval Date

Location
10023 - 104 STREET NW Plan 2320719 Blk 3 Lot 67A
Neighbourhood
DOWNTOWN
 

Back
Top