IanO
Superstar
Not to mention that it was a win-win on ROI for public dollars.
If anything, we need more of these stories, not less.
If anything, we need more of these stories, not less.
Not to mention that it was a win-win on ROI for public dollars.
If anything, we need more of these stories, not less.
IMO, probably not a good time to ask the city, which is financially strapped and already having to increase taxes more than it knows citizens can bear, for money.Since this did work out well, I wonder why developers/downtown boosters didn't advocate for this same grant structure again, which didn't require the city to pay out any money from its budget.
Instead, when they came back to council for support, they focused on a grant per sq.ft and that didn't seem to be as favorable with council nor the public.
Yup, they wanted something like $100/sq. ft. while the City was proposing $50 per sq. ft. at the most. They got greedy and ended up getting nothing.My understanding is that there was a XX$sqft that was palatable and on the table, but folks got a little greedy.
Looking down while drunk from the 42nd at Encore.
Yes it does. I'm hearing it's a daycare.