What do you think of this project?

  • Total voters
    70
Happy New Year!

I think Langham did a good job with the ground level. The southmost CRU is setback nicely to allow for a generous patio. Like everything else of theirs on 104th, it's inviting to those on foot.

I'm hoping for a successful 2025 for Langham. Looking forward to Falcon 2.

PXL_20250101_174831093.MP.jpg
PXL_20250101_174836909.MP.jpg
PXL_20250101_174731630.MP.jpg
PXL_20250101_174735584.MP.jpg
 
Last edited:
This building is ok. But the developer should have gone with black trimmed windows and deck railings. It would have made it look so much more urban and sophisticated. (and not really added to the cost) Such a shame, really. :/
 
Podium turned out better than I expected. White swoopy thing is unnecessary but the windows are transparent and the way the entry is articulated and space given outside is nice. I assume this is mirrored with tower two. (originally there was a courtyard between the two buildings sadly is not there anymore)
 
This isn't facadism. Facadism is the preservation of a historical facade.

This could loosely be considered ornamentation. Imo architectural ornamentation is a crucial part of interesting architecture that is seldom used these days unfortunately. Otherwise you're depending purely on materials and massing to create visual interest.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top