What do you think of this project?


  • Total voters
    50
I deleted it. I thought it was clearly so bad it didn’t need a disclaimer, but I always underestimate how useless humans are.
Not sure why you need to imply I'm useless. That seems uncalled for... I only asked because I have seen official renders from developers that looked much worse than that and I wouldn't put it past Regency to come out with something like that, especially when the city is determining if this property will be considered a problem property or not. The fact that the picture wasn't accompanied by any text or even a winking emoji to give away the fact that it was a joke, is the reason I asked my question. I like to be sure of things in life. I am a gullible person. My apologies if that makes me useless.
 
On an unrelated noted, those Christmas decorations suspended on wires over the street looked amazing.
 
Imagine the presence the Tegler Building would have had, and how it would have complimented the adjacent LRT line. Hopefully this property gets sold to a developer with the vision, resources, and dedication needed to bring something like this back.
View attachment 693060View attachment 693059

My theory: Allowing this building to be destroyed cursed Edmonton to forever have mediocre developments. In order to lift the curse, the building must be reconstructed in some form. What an absolute tragedy for our local architecture :confused:
 
My theory: Allowing this building to be destroyed cursed Edmonton to forever have mediocre developments. In order to lift the curse, the building must be reconstructed in some form. What an absolute tragedy for our local architecture :confused:
It wasn’t just this building - there were probably at least a dozen as prominent, some of them even more significant, and probably dozens more not as prominent but equally missed.
 
My theory: Allowing this building to be destroyed cursed Edmonton to forever have mediocre developments. In order to lift the curse, the building must be reconstructed in some form. What an absolute tragedy for our local architecture :confused:
If we are cursed for anything, it's allowing the last Carnegie Library ever built to be demolished...
 
But just think if they had not demolished the Carnegie Library we would have never gotten that gem of a building we now have on Churchill Square. 🙄
It's funny to read what people thought at the time. From Dane Ryksen:

The Carnegie went on to serve valiantly for three decades, but by the early '60s change was afoot. When MacDonald, Magoon, and Hill designed it, Edmonton was home to 60,000. Since then the city had quintupled in size, and the building was being pushed well beyond its intended capacity and role. Compounding matters was Chief Librarian Morton Coburn. A modernist in every sense, he wanted “contemporary books, contemporary architecture, contemporary librarians, and a contemporary system.” In his mind the old Carnegie Library was an aging anachronism not fit for purpose.

With help from local philanthropist Stanley Milner, Corburn pursued a campaign to replace Edmonton’s acropolis, and in 1965 the City and Library Board agreed that the construction of a new central library would become its principal Centennial project. When the new Centennial Branch opened in 1967, the Carnegie’s death notice came. The jubilant spirits surrounding Canada’s hundredth birthday likely softened the blow. As historian Tony Cashman recalled, “I don’t remember anyone complaining at the time. People were quite excited about the new library in the square. It certainly wasn’t controversial.” Indeed, one Journal columnist summed up the thoughts of most when he opined that “the old place will be missed. It gave much reading pleasure to many and we acknowledge the debt. However, there is no denying that its facilities were overtaxed by a growing Edmonton, and we can all take pride in its handsome successor.”

The City awarded Poole Construction — the library’s builder forty-six years prior — the contract for the Carnegie’s destruction, and demolition commenced in August 1968. Work lasted nearly three months. It turns out the ol’ building was made of sterner stuff then most. “It was no pushover,” Art Evans eulogized:

“The process seemed painfully slow to passerby who had made good use of the library for many years and in doing so developed an affection for the building itself. When it comes time for old friends to go down, buildings or people, we prefer a quick ending. But the library lingered on as though reluctant to leave the scene without a struggle. It’s a relief the battle is over. One can now emerge from the Macdonald hotel and look across the street without wincing.”
 
But just think if they had not demolished the Carnegie Library we would have never gotten that gem of a building we now have on Churchill Square. 🙄
In hindsight, the library built in the 60's was also actually nicer architecturally than the metal blob there now. Aren't things supposed to improve as a city grows? We seem to have gone the other way here with this one.
 
Well, here's hoping that if we manage to survive long enough, the bibliotank, too, will become iconic and beloved 🤣 Not holding my breath though. And, in its defense, it is lovely inside.
Probably not coincidentally, that is a common Edmonton style theme - ugly on the outside but nice on the inside. Not sure why we often can't make more effort for the other part.
 
It wasn’t just this building - there were probably at least a dozen as prominent, some of them even more significant, and probably dozens more not as prominent but equally missed.
The one I find hardest to cope with is the post office
1762465479829.jpeg

1762465622012.jpeg

The commemorative clock only reminds me of what they did.
 
I realize being downtown there are only so many places to build bigger, newer things as the city grows. I can sort of live with some old and nice buildings being gone, if the space it is filled by something decent or nicer.

What irks me, are things like our central Library building which has devolved over the decades from beautiful to ok, now to kind of ugly, even worse the Tegler site which has devolved from a nice old building into an empty lot.
 
Probably not coincidentally, that is a common Edmonton style theme - ugly on the outside but nice on the inside. Not sure why we often can't make more effort for the other part.
Describes Edmonton as a whole perfectly. Ugly on the outside as you’re driving in, but once you get past the inner ring road it’s quite pretty. lol
The one I find hardest to cope with is the post office View attachment 693870
View attachment 693871
The commemorative clock only reminds me of what they did.
I didn’t know about this one. Luckily we held on to:
IMG_1227.png
 

Back
Top