They ditched the increasingly-garbage "data driven" methodology (if you recall, last time it penalized the Beltline for having **too many** restaurants). Just talked to some folks.
Summary:
Best Heritage (pre-1950): Cliff Bungalow
Best Mid-Century (1950-75): Charleswood
Best Late-Century (1975-2000): Millrise
Best New (post 2000): Garrison Woods/Green
Best Future: University District
Best Walkable: Beltline
Best for Nature-Lovers: Lakeview
Best Accessible: Varsity
Best Lake Community: Lake Bonavista
Best for Seniors: Mission
Best Hidden Gem: Greater Forest Lawn
Best BIA: Kensington
Best Industrial: Manchester
The listing also has runners up, and discussion. Overall, a much more reasonable list, although almost all of the communities have above-average house prices. (But I guess you don't see too many $15 places on their best restaurant list either.)
The only one that's baffling is Best Accessible, which talks about the community having a lot of bungalows, signalized pedestrian crossings, and is close to the University which has 'universal design elements' on it's 'accessible amenities'. But there are tons of communities with single-level dwellings and pedestrian crossings, and these sound like they have a lot of overlap with amenities for seniors. The University has accessible features, but I'm not sure what having 400 accessible lecture halls on your doorstep does to help you if you're not a student, and it's not that close; it's great that there aren't stairs in the way of the convenience store in Mac Hall, but it's like a kilometre and a half away.
To my mind, Best Accessible should go to a community like Rundle, which is bordered by virtually all major services (a hospital, a major mall and a big-box precinct, a public rec facility, a high school, supermarkets at the NW, SW and E edges of the community) and has an LRT station and a MAX route (and even ICE service to Airdrie/Cross Iron), plus for drivers is adjacent to a freeway (16th), with both the Deerfoot and ring road a couple of interchanges away.