W
wyliepoon
Guest
Toronto Star:
Link to article
Markham targets monster driveways
Proposed town bylaw would limit width
But move infuriates multi-car owners
Jun. 23, 2006. 05:46 AM
GAIL SWAINSON
STAFF REPORTER
In Markham — land of the monster home, where the car is king — a modest-sized driveway just doesn't cut it.
Some residents here want honkin' when it comes to their driveways, and they are laying down wall-to-wall interlocking brick, from the curb to the front door, to get it.
Not a blade of grass or a hydrangea in sight in some of these front yards. But what they lack in greenery, they make up for in parking spaces.
"It's sheer laziness, they just don't want to have to jockey cars around in their driveways," fumed Jim Matthews, who lives in the historic Markham village of Unionville.
Matthews has been complaining to the town for years about the jumbo-sized driveways that are threatening to swallow up his upscale neighbourhood, near 16th Ave. and Highway 404.
Now, officials of the town — which generally does not allow on-street parking in residential areas — are in the process of rewriting the parking rules to make it harder to expand driveways.
In April, council gave the second of three readings to a bylaw that would restrict the width of a driveway to no more than 1.5 metres wider than the garage door. A second option would give homeowners the right to have a maximum driveway width of 6.1 metres, providing that at least 40 per cent of the front yard comprises landscaping.
But the proposed bylaw did not exempt current oversized driveways, enraging parking-pad supporters.
In the meantime, council asked a citizens' working group to study the matter and report back, and a series of town hall meetings was held to canvass public opinion. Town council will next deal with the issue on Tuesday.
Many residents in the town of 250,000 are welcoming the more restrictive rules, but others, like Gerald Devins, say there is a whole other side to the story.
Devins told a Markham committee earlier this week that his family of four adults all have cars and they need an enlarged parking area to house them.
"Everyone around here relies on these expanded driveways," he said. "No one wants to talk about the legitimate parking needs of the residents."
In an interview yesterday, Devins said he spent a lot of money to have his home, near Bayview Ave. and John St., landscaped in an attractive fashion to accommodate more vehicles.
"As long as I am not harming anyone, I should be able to do what I want with my own property," an irate Devins said. "Is this Soviet Russia that we don't get to park our cars where we want?"
Opponents have demanded that residents who currently have front-yard parking pads be excluded from the bylaw, and that the town reject or limit parking restrictions. But supporters want tighter rules. At a committee meeting on Monday at Markham civic centre, the citizens' working group delivered a report outlining its recommendations. These included allowing all but the "worst offenders" to keep their driveway space.
But residents lined up to tell the committee that limiting parking does nothing to solve the problem of large families who have many vehicles.
"Surely there are issues more pressing to be dealt with," Eric Lerner told the committee. "This just baffles me."
The issue has also been controversial in Toronto, where a joint committee has supported new rules that will continue to block front-yard parking in the city core and most parts of the former suburbs.
Brampton prohibits parking in front yards and does not allow the width of a driveway to be more than half the width of the lot. The maximum driveway width in Mississauga ranges from 6 metres to 8.5 metres, based on lot size.
Link to article
Markham targets monster driveways
Proposed town bylaw would limit width
But move infuriates multi-car owners
Jun. 23, 2006. 05:46 AM
GAIL SWAINSON
STAFF REPORTER
In Markham — land of the monster home, where the car is king — a modest-sized driveway just doesn't cut it.
Some residents here want honkin' when it comes to their driveways, and they are laying down wall-to-wall interlocking brick, from the curb to the front door, to get it.
Not a blade of grass or a hydrangea in sight in some of these front yards. But what they lack in greenery, they make up for in parking spaces.
"It's sheer laziness, they just don't want to have to jockey cars around in their driveways," fumed Jim Matthews, who lives in the historic Markham village of Unionville.
Matthews has been complaining to the town for years about the jumbo-sized driveways that are threatening to swallow up his upscale neighbourhood, near 16th Ave. and Highway 404.
Now, officials of the town — which generally does not allow on-street parking in residential areas — are in the process of rewriting the parking rules to make it harder to expand driveways.
In April, council gave the second of three readings to a bylaw that would restrict the width of a driveway to no more than 1.5 metres wider than the garage door. A second option would give homeowners the right to have a maximum driveway width of 6.1 metres, providing that at least 40 per cent of the front yard comprises landscaping.
But the proposed bylaw did not exempt current oversized driveways, enraging parking-pad supporters.
In the meantime, council asked a citizens' working group to study the matter and report back, and a series of town hall meetings was held to canvass public opinion. Town council will next deal with the issue on Tuesday.
Many residents in the town of 250,000 are welcoming the more restrictive rules, but others, like Gerald Devins, say there is a whole other side to the story.
Devins told a Markham committee earlier this week that his family of four adults all have cars and they need an enlarged parking area to house them.
"Everyone around here relies on these expanded driveways," he said. "No one wants to talk about the legitimate parking needs of the residents."
In an interview yesterday, Devins said he spent a lot of money to have his home, near Bayview Ave. and John St., landscaped in an attractive fashion to accommodate more vehicles.
"As long as I am not harming anyone, I should be able to do what I want with my own property," an irate Devins said. "Is this Soviet Russia that we don't get to park our cars where we want?"
Opponents have demanded that residents who currently have front-yard parking pads be excluded from the bylaw, and that the town reject or limit parking restrictions. But supporters want tighter rules. At a committee meeting on Monday at Markham civic centre, the citizens' working group delivered a report outlining its recommendations. These included allowing all but the "worst offenders" to keep their driveway space.
But residents lined up to tell the committee that limiting parking does nothing to solve the problem of large families who have many vehicles.
"Surely there are issues more pressing to be dealt with," Eric Lerner told the committee. "This just baffles me."
The issue has also been controversial in Toronto, where a joint committee has supported new rules that will continue to block front-yard parking in the city core and most parts of the former suburbs.
Brampton prohibits parking in front yards and does not allow the width of a driveway to be more than half the width of the lot. The maximum driveway width in Mississauga ranges from 6 metres to 8.5 metres, based on lot size.




