News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
Whether you intend that or not, it creates a problem as bad, or worse than the one you actually fear.
Living in constant fear/paranoia (while physically unharmed) is certainly not desirable, but I don't see how it's worse than having that kind of physical harm actually happen to oneself.
While the value is, even if real, probably unprovable. (incident type x that you worry about does not happen after said unit is deployed for the next 10 years). Wonderful, but the fact that no similar incident has happened in the preceding decade without any such action.........
To use a specific example, if "incident type x" is 9/11, it's true that no such incident happened in the several decades of commercial aviation before 9/11, but that doesn't mean it's safe to ever go back to pre-9/11 security going forward. In this case, the value of increased security is very much provable.

Though of course there's also the question of, even if incident type x is made essentially impossible, what can be done to prevent anyone out there from coming up with incident type y, z, etc, that are currently unheard of.
 
Much better than this happening. This story in particular enraged & shook me to my core (I'll admit I was even a bit shaky while typing this), and still leaves lasting fear for my and others' safety, because I have a dreadful feeling that this threat is far from over. What is it with people always complaining how "dystopian" enhanced safety measures feel, instead of complaining about the evil that made those safety measures necessary in the first place.
Which part of that article required police to cosplay soldiers on street corners to stop Mostafa Eldidi, and Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi?

Let me save you the time in coming up with some excuse, it was not required at all.

Security theater isn't security. Actual intelligence work is, as is evident from your own example.


To use a specific example, if "incident type x" is 9/11, it's true that no such incident happened in the several decades of commercial aviation before 9/11, but that doesn't mean it's safe to ever go back to pre-9/11 security going forward. In this case, the value of increased security is very much provable.
Outside of improved cockpit doors, musch of it has shown to be ineffective theater.
 
Last edited:
Looks like Chow is going full Mamdani ahead of the election:


Toronto is moving ahead with plans to create a paid “surge capacity” sidewalk‑shovelling program, directing senior staff to design a system that would pay residents or temporary workers to clear snow after major storms. The proposal, modelled on programs in New York City, Minneapolis and Montreal, is now slated for implementation no later than the 2026–27 winter season.
The decision follows a pair of council votes Thursday morning, where the amended motion passed 21–5 before the full item was adopted 17–9. The directive instructs the Deputy City Manager of Infrastructure Services, working with Transportation Services, the Chief People Officer, and the City Solicitor, to develop a program to rapidly deploy paid shovellers during major snowfalls. The goal is to supplement existing city crews and contractors when storms overwhelm regular operations. “Cities do best when we learn from each other and adopt best practices from other cities,” Mayor Olivia Chow wrote in a letter to the executive committee earlier this month. “We now have the opportunity to engage our counterparts in New York City on their recent success with a paid relief snow shovelling program, and implement lessons learned right here in Toronto.” The model is expected to draw on best practices from cities that already use paid community‑based or temporary labour to clear sidewalks quickly during heavy snow events. The program would not replace Toronto’s current sidewalk‑clearing system but would serve as an emergency layer of support during major storms — a key point raised by councillors, who argued that the city needs more flexibility as winters become increasingly unpredictable. The amendment directing staff to design the program passed with strong support on Thursday, with councillors Mike Colle, Vincent Crisanti, Stephen Holyday, Frances Nunziata and James Pasternak as the five to vote against. The program must be ready for implementation no later than the 2026–27 winter season, though city councillors signalled interest in launching earlier if feasible.


Mamdani-style public grocery stores are coming to Toronto—eventually​

City council wants to sell you bread​

The City of Toronto wants to get into the grocery business, council decided today. Taking a page from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, Toronto will look into opening four non-profit, city-run grocery stores, which would sell staple goods at prices lower than those of grocery giants like Loblaws and Sobeys. According to the motion put forward by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, the city would open four grocery stores, one for each of Etobicoke, North York, downtown and Scarborough, and in low-income areas where fresh groceries are hard to come by. As not-for-profits, the stores would keep markups on foodstuffs to an absolute minimum. The city is also considering exempting them from expenses like property taxes and development charges, savings that could then be passed on to consumers. In theory, these aspects of the city-run model would keep prices lower at these stores than their private, for-profit competitors. Council was near-unanimous in its support of the idea, with the sole exception of Councillor Stephen Holyday—a man with a reputation for going it alone against popular proposals. “I don’t think the government could possibly run this more efficiently than the private sector does,” he said during the debate, reports journalist Matt Elliott on Bluesky. City staff also threw some cold water on the proposal, with a financial impact report noting that no money yet exists in the city’s budget to open new grocery stores, and that doing so could cost quite a lot indeed. To make it work, the city would have to acquire buildings, buy refrigerators and set up entirely new supply chains, staff pointed out, and it’s unclear what all that would cost. Creating a brand new grocer is no small task, and the city has given itself a while to figure it all out. City staff aren’t due to report back with a plan until spring 2027, a whole year from now, and actual implementation would only happen sometime after that. Unfortunately for our checkbooks, grocery stores are slow-growing fruits.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top