[thommyjo]

Regardless if it was AI or not though, the real point was that Walters was on side with Better Edmonton originally, according to Party Chair (not AI), and then Walters decided to run on his own rather than support Cartmell. Or are you suggesting it's AI's belief that Walters was onside with Better Edmonton originally and none of this is the belief of the Party Chair?

I think he’s mocking AI slop and saying it’s a “tell” of BE’s incompetence and leadership issues.

 

[policyenthusiast]

Regardless if it was AI or not though, the real point was that Walters was on side with Better Edmonton originally, according to Party Chair (not AI), and then Walters decided to run on his own rather than support Cartmell. Or are you suggesting it's AI's belief that Walters was onside with Better Edmonton originally and none of this is the belief of the Party Chair?

No, I know nothing about any of that. I'm saying it's bad writing.

 

[David A]

The bitterness in the article comes through in a way I am not sure AI could yet replicate. I realize it may have been their impression Walters was initially on side, but that may or may not have been true.

Even if it was, they failed to keep him onside probably because of how they conducted their campaign. He ran after he saw them floundering some and not really connecting with voters.