News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
W

wyliepoon

Guest
Post on "placemaking" in Mississauga centre

Link to article

Mississauga aims to make city core people-friendly
Parks and game areas among recommendations in new report

Natalie Alcoba
National Post

Wednesday, September 20, 2006



A new vision for Mississauga's downtown proposes tearing down walls that hide a City Hall plaza, building an outdoor wedding chapel and creating a chain of connected parklands to draw residents to the city's core and make them want to spend time there.

The advice from a New York firm hired to help invigorate the unused spaces around City Hall includes many small suggestions: hanging flower baskets, chess and checker tables and outdoor vending kiosks.

But its more ambitious recommendations include redeveloping Duke of York Boulevard -- a busy thoroughfare that provides access to Square One mall -- into a low-rise, multi-use "main street."

But ambition appears to be abundant in this sprawling suburb of 700,000, as the city seeks an accessible, pedestrian-friendly downtown to cater to the growing number of people living there. Residential buildings scraping the sky prove the downtown is booming, even if it is hard to find anyone walking around.

"What is missing from our downtown is people," said Bruce Carr, director of the strategic planning and business services division in the city's planning and building department. "It's not being used. It's pretty dead space."

Two years ago, Mississauga sought guidance from New York's Project for Public Spaces [PPS], a non-profit organization that has helped hundreds of cities across the continent and around the world re-energize their public spaces. A draft of PPS's 60-page report "Building Mississauga Around Places" was presented to council last week and is available for viewing and feedback on the city's Web site. The final version is expected in the coming months.

"This was a place that was in triage," said PPS vice-president Phil Myrick, the principal author of the report. "The level of effort needed to make [the downtown] an attractive place was beyond what an average city staff can think through on its own. We were very happy to help them."

Mississauga's downtown -- located around Square One in the area of Burnhamthorpe Road and Hurontario Street -- already has key features in place: the Living Arts Centre and the central library. But these facilities stand separately, are poorly connected and are almost exclusively accessible by car, the report notes. The challenge is to pull the destinations together and make residents understand and enjoy them as parts of a whole.

"We want people here to think of Mississauga, not Toronto, when they want to go downtown," said Mr. Carr, who was yesterday interviewing candidates for a three-person team called Building a City for the Twenty First Century. The crew, led by Mr. Carr, will tackle Mississauga's redesign, charting a course for the downtown, the waterfront and neighbourhood development.

Change is already happening. Workers were busy yesterday shrinking massive Burnhamthorpe Road, near Duke of York Boulevard, from six lanes to five, making room for cars to parallel park. The idea came from residents who considered the roadway too daunting to cross.

The PPS report suggests transforming City Hall and the library into a "cohesive civic square" that is designed, operated and managed as an outdoor community centre.

New parklands will be created to encourage people to get outside and go exploring. The civic square will need tables with umbrellas; trees, awnings and tent structures to provide shelter; better lighting; kiosks; and an international newsstand to compel people to stay.

The report is bursting with ideas -- most of which came from public consultations with local residents -- but there is only so much a city can do. It spent $100,000 on the PPS report and another $100,000 from its budget to test a lineup of city centre programming this summer.

Mr. Carr said the entire makeover could cost $4- to $5-million -- much of it to develop the parks -- and funding would not be available until 2008. In the meantime, the city will continue with programming that has been a hit. Local restaurants showcased eclectic fare every Friday for lunch, and roads were closed at night to play basketball; there was an antique car show, a rib fest and concerts.

"We always thought the square in front of City Hall was too big because it was always empty. Now I look at it and I think it's too small," Mr. Carr said.


CITY RENEWAL

Ten of the recommendations of the "Building Mississauga Around Places" report:

- Outdoor wedding chapel

- Outdoor reading room in the library plaza, with a cafe, comfortable chairs and book racks

- Tent boutiques staffed by retailers and civic associations

- Rebuild and expand the City Hall skating rink

- A games area (bocce, chess, shuffleboard) for all ages

- A year-round, enclosed daily farmers' market

- A park with a fountain and major sculpture

- A tea house with outdoor seating to take it all in

- More and better signage at City Hall

- Bus stops strategically located around activities

Ran with fact box "City Renewal" which has been appended to the story.
 
Regarding Natalie Alcoba article in the National Post, "Mississauga aims to make city core people-friendly":

The article states:

Two years ago, Mississauga sought guidance from New York's Project for Public Spaces [PPS], a non-profit organization that has helped hundreds of cities across the continent and around the world re-energize their public spaces. A draft of PPS's 60-page report "Building Mississauga Around Places" was presented to council last week and is available for viewing and feedback on the city's Web site. The final version is expected in the coming months.

As a regular visitor to the mississauga.ca website, I was immediately puzzled. Why on earth would Mississauga's "Best and Brightest" who "who continually put in 110 per cent" need guidance to the tune of $100,000 from a New York consulting agency?!

It took all of three minutes of surfing the New York's Project for Public Spaces [PPS] website to discover a possible reason.

PPS had the Mississauga Civic Center on its Public Spaces HALL OF SHAME.

Yes. The Mississauga Civic Center on the PPS Public Spaces HALL OF SHAME!

*GASP*

[link=http://http://www.pps.org/great_public_spaces/one?public_place_id=922 newwindow]Mississauga Hall of Shame[/link]

After more digging, it's certainly forgiveable to conclude that Mississauga decided the best strategy and the quickest way to get off the PPS HALL OF SHAME was to grant the New York agency a $100,000 consulting contract.

A surf to the mississauga.ca website reveals that Mississauga conducted:

meetings in October 2005 to begin the planning of improvements to the city centre plaza spaces...

Alcoba's National Post article quotes PPS vice-president Phil Myrick as pronouncing the Mississauga civic center as a place "in triage".

Also Alcoba writes in her September 20th article that, "A draft of PPS's 60-page report "Building Mississauga Around Places" was presented to council last week" (That's a time-line of October 2005 to mid-September 2006)

On September 20, 2006, at PPS's website there is the announcement "Downtown Mississauga - Removed from PPS's Hall of Shame!"

[link=http://http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:BlqU8tmSknEJ:[url]www.pps.org/+%22Downtown+Mississauga+-+Removed+from+PPS%27s+Hall+of+Shame!%22+%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3[/url] newwindow]Google Shame Removed Search[/link]

So. Some time that I can't determine, New York's Project for Public Spaces [PPS] adds the Mississauga Civic Center to its Public Spaces HALL OF SHAME --likely 2004...

1. Two years ago, Mississauga then pays $100,000 to Project for Public Spaces [PPS] for "guidance".

2. October 2005 meetings begin to actually plan improvements.

3. National Post reports that the Placemaking plan is presented to council (September 13, 2006).

4. September 20th, PPS website has the entry, "Downtown Mississauga - Removed from PPS's Hall of Shame!"


In just eleven months since planning meetings began, the very civic centre assessed as "in triage" by PPS vice-president Phil Myrick goes from a HALL OF SHAMEr to removal from the list.

There's more.

Also at the PPS website, there's another National Post article --this one by Dave McGinn.

Headline reads, "N.Y. group flunks T.O. waterfront Adds it to 'Hall of Shame'

Date of article? Friday, August 04, 2006.

Toronto's waterfront has just been put in the same class as Brooklyn Bridge Park in Brooklyn, N.Y., Exchange Square in Manchester, England, and the Place de la Concorde in Paris...


...Election to the group's Hall of Shame is based on access, comfort, usage and activities and sociability.

Toronto comes on. Mississauga comes off.

YO! TEE! OH! Heads up!


Actually, as of today there are 58 public spaces listed in the PPS HALL OF SHAME. And I'm absolutely baffled why downtown Bagdad didn't make the cut.


Anyway...hmmmm... $100,00 times 58 HALL OF SHAMErs...


Signed:
The Mississauga Muse
 
Get a group of self appointed "experts" together.

Identify a "problem".

Set yourself up as the "solution".

Find a need, and fill it. Nothing new here.
 
Well Mississauga Muse, welcome to the forum. Having said that I certainly find your comments a bit cynical. I am a resident of Mississauga and like many others have been unimpressed with the so-called downtown area. Let's face it, for years it was a mall with a huge parking lot, surrounded by a few office towers and one arts centre which perhaps could have been better designed. It would have been on a "Hall of Shame" list by a lot of people's criteria.

More recently, if you have looked around, you may have noticed that there actually have been some changes made. It's not just talk. There's a lot more to do, but the commitment and the action are both evident now, and removal from this list reflects a bit more than just a fee paid to PPS.
 
Hi, Observer Walt,

Well Mississauga Muse, welcome to the forum. Having said that I certainly find your comments a bit cynical.

Yes, well, it was after all, my first post, so I tried hard to hold back on the Cynicism Factor.

Let's face it, for years it was a mall with a huge parking lot, surrounded by a few office towers and one arts centre which perhaps could have been better designed. It would have been on a "Hall of Shame" list by a lot of people's criteria.

Sure. No argument there.

Just found it interesting that the municipality that Leads Today for Tomorrow, couldn't find a Canadian consultancy group with similar Placemaking expertise...

..not even in Alberta.


Signed,
The Mississauga Muse
 
Btw, Toronto's waterfront has been on the Hall of Shame for some time now. It wasn't that it popped up suddenly after MCC came off.

While you may try to imply that the $100,000 went to mainly buy Mississauga off the list, I think the initatives that the city undertook with "My Mississauga" and the general attitide shift at city hall have all been influential as well. No way is it perfect and it has a long way to go but compared to most others on the list it has made significant strides to improve itself. Once the major recommendations from the report are underway then there will likely be a big change in the face of Mississauga and now that there's something more concrete (not that MCC needs more of it) guiding the growth of the the western side of MCC we'll be seeing a new urban environment that may set a precedence in greenfield urban development.

I also think that going with PPS made a lot more sense then going with some other group considering they have done some miracle work, espeically with places like Detroit we're they're/they've helped in part to slowly bring back life to a dead area.
 
Hey there, jeicow

Btw, Toronto's waterfront has been on the Hall of Shame for some time now.

Yes. Since around August 4th according to the National Post article..

It wasn't that it popped up suddenly after MCC came off.

Never suggested it did. My message states that Toronto came on in August while Missisauga came off in September.

While you may try to imply that the $100,000 went to mainly buy Mississauga off the list, I think the initatives that the city undertook with "My Mississauga" and the general attitide shift at city hall have all been influential as well.

Actually, I just did some digging and determined that as late as February 4, 2005, Mississauga was not one of the 42 nominees on the Project for Public Spaces (PPS) HALL OF SHAME.

So that means that PPS nominated ("nominated" = "Contributed by Project for Public Spaces") the Mississauga Civic Centre while the consultation was ongoing

I also think that going with PPS made a lot more sense then going with some other group considering they have done some miracle work, espeically with places like Detroit we're they're/they've helped in part to slowly bring back life to a dead area.

Agreed. Just found this at an old PPS website.

"About PPS

PPS is a non-profit organization that for 25 years has successfully carried out its mission statement to build communities by creating the special places that build community life. PPS has brought its technical assistance, research and educational efforts to over 1000 communities, throughout the United States as well as abroad, to improve the comfort, attractiveness, social and economic use and vitality of their public spaces."

That was up on their January 7, 2001 webpage.

"25 years has successfully carried out its mission statement" suggests that the concept of "community/place-based approach to planning and decision-making" has been around since the mid-late 70's.

now that there's something more concrete (not that MCC needs more of it) guiding the growth of the the western side of MCC

Have you been in Mississauga since the 70's? I'm asking because, as you pointed out, yes, "Concrete" Happened.

Anyway... Moving Forward, I always like to check out the weather before I head out each morning...

PERSONAL WEATHER STATION

Yep. Won't need an umbrella...

Hope that you enjoy your day.


Signed:

The Mississauga Muse
 
I had my first taste of MCC this week, and I was quite shocked to see how stereotypically suburban it was. Everything was scattered, large distances (for walking at least) separate everything, the streets are huge, and parking lots are abundant. I honestly can't tell the difference in terms of urban planning between MCC and the Promenade mall or Fairview.

The biggest obstacle is the massive footrpint that MCC as a whole occupies. No matter how much landscaping is put in, nothing will change the fact that wherever you live, you're far from the mall, and far from other buildings based on the assumption that people are supposed to be walking. Retail must be decentralized and placed at the base of condos, while the number of buildings will have to quadruple.
 
Chuck, your points are well taken and I would not actually disagree. I would point out that the plan currently being proposed addresses many of the items you have mentioned: One of the wide streets is being narrowed and made more pedestrian-friendly, as we speak. Retail is already being installed at the base of several of the new condos, facing directly on the sidewalks, and will be required in several others now on the drawing boards. Several low-rise buildings are proposed for the east side of Duke of York Blvd, on the current Square One parking lot, and will tie together the mall and the civic square area to the west. And certainly many more condos, 30 storeys high or more, are coming, mainly to the west of the City Hall / Living Arts area.

I'm speculating, but I strongly suspect some further development will also be seen on the northwest parking lot of Square One, west of the transit terminal. It's pretty valuable land, which is a bit of a wasteland and underutilized at present.

The big missing piece of the puzzle is transit (another whole story, covered elsewhere on this forum).

Stay tuned. Some very interesting things are happening here.
 
"One of the wide streets is being narrowed and made more pedestrian-friendly, as we speak."

That doesn't matter when you're walking kilometres from one place to another within MCC.
 
One of the wide streets is being narrowed and made more pedestrian-friendly, as we speak
That doesn't matter when you're walking kilometres from one place to another within MCC.

Indeed.

Considering the demographics (aging Boomers continuing to age, atop exisiting seniors) --perhaps "walking kilometres from one place to another" should read, "shuffling from one place to another"?...

I just hope the planners know enough to incorporate into the MCC design, numerous, strategically-placed P-stations!

Perhaps they can be camouflaged as kiosks, complete with Corporate logo and festooned with hanging baskets...

Signed
The (always trying to be proactive) Mississauga Muse
 
Oh yes, lots of open space in MCC. Yes, most of MCC is undeveloped, all the recent condo developments have been on greenfields, so it is a little too early to consider it complete or a failure, or a complete failure. But there aren't many olf in MCC, despite what Mississauga Muse says.

At it's widest, MCC is only 2km wide. If that is too much for you, then you are out of shape. You should exercise more, or go on a diet. You'll not only be able to get around more easily, you'll look less ugly too.
 
^ :lol

People will gladly walk much more than 2 km. if the walk is interesting. On the other hand 1 km. (a pretty short distance) seems like a lot if the surroundings are bleak.
 
doady

You wrote:

But there aren't many olf in MCC, despite what Mississauga Muse says.

Please explain.

At it's widest, MCC is only 2km wide.

Really. That all? Humhnn. Quel surprise.

If that is too much for you, then you are out of shape. You should exercise more, or go on a diet. You'll not only be able to get around more easily, you'll look less ugly too.

Actually, I exercise at least four hours a day at the Mississauga YMCA across the street from The Yellow Bricks. I think that's probably why I think of Downtown Mississauga as Concrete, Pavement, and Condo Central.

I walk the indoor track at the Y and there are full-length wall-to-wall mirrors that ensure I'm greeted to a visual cacophony of concrete, pavement, traffic and my personal favourite --billboards with smiling and yes, attractive people who look like they can't wait to flip the condos they just bought along Burnamthorpe for a chunky profit.

Speaking of chunky...

Regarding your comment about fat people. I lost close to a hundred pounds in the last few years and I'm so grateful now to finally be normal-sized. However, I still can sympathize with the private pain and stigma attached to FAT.

I'm reminded of a terrific shirt I once saw.

(She rummages through the Internet.... ah yes, HERE it is...)

INDEFENCEOFFATPEOPLE

Signed,
The (YMCA)Mississauga Muse
 

Back
Top