News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

W. K. Lis

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
24,069
Reaction score
14,770
City:
Toronto
From Toronto Sun article of Sunday, February 15, 2009:

Province eyes Metrolinx shakeup

By ANTONELLA ARTUSO, QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU CHIEF

A key piece of Premier Dalton McGuinty's plan to stimulate Ontario's auto-ravaged and recession- battered economy is to build government infrastructure.

Public transportation is the big winner and though Metrolinx, a relatively new provincial agency, some $50 billion will be spent over the next 25 years on a staggering list of 52 rapid transit projects across the GTA.

It is an historic undertaking, on a scope not seen in this province since the Centennial construction spree of the federal government in the mid-1960s, and there are already signs of trouble.

Metrolinx was intended to be a champion to confront the horrendous gridlock that for decades has paralyzed Toronto, the GTA and Hamilton areas.

Traffic is not only choking the work-home commute for workers, it's strangling trade and economic development in the region.

Estimates suggest traffic will increase four-fold over the next quarter of a century and that the cost of congestion will increase to as much as $28 million a day.

But instead of a dragon slayer, there is growing concern that the Metrolinx board, dominated by municipal politicians, is enabling red tape, funding disputes, resident opposition and parochial decision-making.

Those who have expressed concern with the "consensus" goverance model include its chair and, sources tell Sun Media, Premier Dalton McGuinty.

FAST-TRACK

McGuinty, counting on the provincial agency to fast-track the $11.5 billion he's set aside to spend on transit, is being urged to take the politics out of the Metrolinx board.

Municipal board members, including Toronto Mayor David Miller, may be replaced with government and private sector experts with backgrounds in finance, construction and project management.

That decision could be made as soon as this spring while the province looks at other major transit changes, including the merger of Metrolinx and GO Transit.

In addition to Miller, Mississauga's Mayor Hazel McCallion and TTC chairman Adam Giambrone and city councillor Norm Kelly are among the local politicians who may be turfed from Metrolinx.

Roger Anderson, Chair of Durham Region; Halton's chairman Gary Carr; Fred Eisenberger, the mayor of Hamilton and Bill Fisch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Regional Municipality of York Region are other local politicians on the Metrolinx board.

The eight municipal politicians hold the balance of power on the 11-member board.

One of the influential groups lobbying for a change in governance structure at Metrolinx is the Toronto Board of Trade.

President and CEO Carol Wilding said the board structure needs to evolve following the release last fall of its $50 billion regional transportation plan, The Big Move.

Similar transit planning groups in other jurisdictions have developed implementation boards that rely heavily, and in some cases totally, on private experts with the necessary background to carry through with major infrastructure projects, she said.

"We've been advocating heavily that you really need to leverage private sector experience," Wilding said. "It is critical that that governance body has to be one whose priorities are really focused beyond election cycles and any changes in political agendas."

Metrolinx Chair Rob MacIsaac said he believes the politician-dominated board worked well in developing its regional plan, which calls for the addition of 1,200 km of new rapid transit lines, but he too sees a need to speed up the process.

"I would love for things to be moving faster than they are but the tools that I've been given are basically consensus-based and so that's the model that I'm working with," MacIsaac said. "That sometimes takes longer than you might like."

Asked if the nature of the Metrolinx board has to change to implement this plan, and if the competing transportation priorities of different jurisdictions might slow down implementation of the Big Move, MacIsaac said that is a question for Premier McGuinty.

"I think it's a good question and I don't know the answer," he said. "There are huge challenges that remain for Metrolinx, challenges associated with the tools in our tool box, challenges associated with trying to get all of these different interests working together and so I'm not underestimating those.

PREEM 'WANTS ACTION'

"But what's clear to me from the premier is that he wants action and I think that's a message that all of the transit operations across the region should be cognizant of."

Political appointees to Metrolinx that spoke to Sun Media -- McCallion, Giambrone and Carr -- all believe the board is working co-operatively and competently.

Carr said it's taken time to build up staff at Metrolinx -- "it was poor old Rob MacIssaac in a room with one little chair" -- but worries about parochial interests trumping good transit planning haven't materialized.

"Even the members who are on from Toronto have been very good about thinking about the region, not just thinking about their own TTC," Carr said. "But having said that, that's a major part of it because obviously it's in the centre of everything. Certainly a lot of the board members realize that this won't work without the co-operation of the TTC because it is a main part of it."

McCallion said the hold up is not municipal politicians, but federal funding red tape and process that binds up major projects so tightly they never get going.

"If you were in business and you used the process that we use in government, you'd be out of business overnight," she said.

"There's no way that anything can move based on the present process."

Municipalities have told the federal government repeatedly that it needs to flow money directly to them, rather than doling it out on a project-by-project basis, if it really intends to use infrastructure to stimulate the sagging economy.

"They didn't change the process," McCallion said. "The recession could be over before the shovels get into the ground."

"Shovel ready" projects is the trendy buzzword being tossed around by all levels of government promising new infrastructure spending.

But it certainly hasn't been soil that's been shovelled over the last few decades as politicians posed for repeated media photo opportunities to announce projects that never made it into the station.

The poster child for tied up transit just might be the Spadina subway extension -- first announced in Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan's 2006 budget and the first TTC subway proposed to extend outside Toronto.

The project would allow Toronto and York Region to extend the subway to the Vaughan Corporate Centre at Hwy. 7.

Double environmental assessments, lengthy waits for funding approvals, red tape, and political wrangling left the project on paper for two years, although politicians say now it's finally barrelling ahead.

Toronto has also just approved the extension of the Yonge subway line north into York Region.

TTC Chairman Giambrone, also a member of the Metrolinx board, said that project is an example of how the members of the agency have been able to work through any disagreements.

"To be honest with you, the TTC would not have built the subway north into York region but York Region has been very supportive of the Transit City lines, so you work with your partners," he said.

Transit City is Toronto's plan to build seven new light rail transit lines across the city -- a venture that has been included in Metrolinx's Big Move regional plan despite concerns that subways were the better way to go.

Giambrone said municipal politicians with extensive transit experience, and not unelected board members, are in the best position to complete the vision of a regional transit system.

"Citizens don't control or oversee municipalities," he said.

But Toronto Councillor Michael Walker doesn't believe that Toronto councillors on the board are playing nice.

Council's so-called support of the York Region subway came with enough non-negotiable caveats that it effectively is the same as a rejection, he said.

"I refer to that as the poison pill resolution," Walker said, describing Toronto's demand for funding to overhaul the Bloor-Yonge subway station and TTC control of the entire project.

Metrolinx is forever looking over its shoulder at its creator, the provincial government, while getting outflanked by the TTC which tries to scuttle their proposals, he said.

"Metrolinx is really the weak sister ... because it doesn't have the political connection with Queen's Park," he said. "And Queen's Park has got a split personality because they don't want to offend ... Miller and the NDP in Toronto."

Effective planning for a mass transit system from Hamilton to Peterborough cannot go forward with the current structure of Metrolinx, an organization that has become paralyzed, he said.

"The core of a mass transit system is going to ride through Toronto," Walker said. "You've got to do subways ... Miller has rejected them. Metrolinx is going to have to get control at least of the TTC's mass transit portion, and that's the subways, and then go from there."
 
Sounds very encouraging (taking politicians off the board). Hopefully decisions will start to be made a little more pragmatically.

The dogma regarding subways in the City itself has been unreal. LRT makes a whole lot of sense for many routes, but places like the SRT and Shepperd are not one of them. Even just deciding where Transit City lines will go should be done in a much more technical, less 'social engineer' fashion. You have to realize that putting a transit line through a poor neighbourhood won't necessarily make those poor better-off. It could just as easily drive those poor out with rising rents. Makes it seem like you 'fix' the neighbourhood, but it's all an illusion.
 
I disagree, and am in agreement with McCallion on this one.

Transportation should be exclusively a Provincial and Municipal jurisdiction. The Federal Government has no business in it, except for Freight Rail and VIA. Leave it to the people that it really matters to, because the Federal Government clearly doesn't care about transportation given their track record.

The Province should go it alone without Federal Government support, otherwise we'll be waiting forever for a 1/3rd of the funding that will never arrive. Case in point, it wasn't in the latest budget. In fact, the entire pie dedicated to infrastructure nation-wide is less than the $6B requested for MoveOntario 2020. There's obviously not a shred of interest from the Federal Government in Greater Golden Horseshoe transportation. So they can get out. Forget their funding, forget their useless duplicate EAs, forget their "screenings" and just leave it to the people that actually care about getting something built. There's no point in having the Federal Government hold us back by useless hoops to jump through that have mostly already been done for another level of government.

Get rid of the Federal Government involvement and projects will flow a lot faster. The Province's debt will of course be higher, but if McGuinty has some balls, he'll take the tax rate back up to 15% by applying a 2% transportation tax [or something along that line].
 
The final report to the board from the Citizen's Advisory Committee did recommend that the board of directors be augmented by non-political experts from stakeholder groups. The examples we used included representatives from the Pension Plan Management sector. They are salivating at the opportunity to invest in infrastructure, so why not formally bring their expertise to the table? Instead of investing in airports in Malaysia, for example, why not facilitate keeping that cash at home?
 
It is a great idea. Metrolinx needs more experts to run the show instead of municipal politicians with agenda (Giambrone = LRT). Had this been instituted earlier we would not have had an effective moratorium on subway construction that serves the 416 exclusively. Metrolinx is one organization that should bully around municipalities a little more often. The OMB that's a different story.

Railization, did you read the article? It never referred to greater federal involvement on the Metrolinx board. Transportation within the province is exclusively a provincially regulated affair...which is also why it's quite paradoxical to demand that the feds pay 1/3 of all major transit initiatives in the country and then refuse to give them any say because they don't have 'jurisdiction'. Anyway, if we want federal dollars flowing quickly, arguably the best way to pull it off is to give them a seat or two on the Metrolinx board. All of a sudden, every MP of every stripe would not be able to shirk responsibility for poor transit in his riding by claiming that it's not a federal area of responsibility and that the feds have no levers on the issue.

I agree with your assertion that McGuinty should bump up the sales tax to raise revenue. In fact, he had an excellent opportunity each time the feds dropped the GST. He didn't take it. It's quite easy for the mayors to chant 'one cent'. But how come they didn't keep the pressure on McGuinty after the federal gst cut came?
 
It is a great idea. Metrolinx needs more experts to run the show instead of municipal politicians with agenda (Giambrone = LRT). Had this been instituted earlier we would not have had an effective moratorium on subway construction that serves the 416 exclusively. Metrolinx is one organization that should bully around municipalities a little more often. The OMB that's a different story.

Railization, did you read the article? It never referred to greater federal involvement on the Metrolinx board. Transportation within the province is exclusively a provincially regulated affair...which is also why it's quite paradoxical to demand that the feds pay 1/3 of all major transit initiatives in the country and then refuse to give them any say because they don't have 'jurisdiction'. Anyway, if we want federal dollars flowing quickly, arguably the best way to pull it off is to give them a seat or two on the Metrolinx board. All of a sudden, every MP of every stripe would not be able to shirk responsibility for poor transit in his riding by claiming that it's not a federal area of responsibility and that the feds have no levers on the issue.
I did read the article. Did you? Doesn't sound like it given the comments you made. I also didn't refer to any involvement of the Feds on the Metrolinx board, so I don't think you even read my post, nevermind the article.

It's federal red tape that is slowing everything down. That red tape keeps the money from flowing from federal coffers into the transit projects, and includes, among other things, duplicate EAs. It's time to stop these non-productive agreements where all 3 levels of government pitch in, because it ensures that nothing ever gets done. Just leave it to the Province since a)Feds have no interest in giving any money, and b) Municipalities never have any money since they have no (or too few) taxing powers.

It's not the composition of the board that's the problem. I think that there is actually more accountability to the Board when it is made up of elected representatives instead of private experts that aren't accountable to anybody and face no real consequences to their jobs from their decisions. You also need to get off this hang-up you have over LRT being the source of all evil.
 
I did read the article. Did you? Doesn't sound like it given the comments you made. I also didn't refer to any involvement of the Feds on the Metrolinx board, so I don't think you even read my post, nevermind the article.

The title of the article and the topic relates to a projected Metrolinx shakeup in order to fast track projects. How does that warrant a rant against the feds? Sure they have their faults. But MacIsaac's comments certainly have a subtext about working with municipal politicians which in my view was the focus of the article.

It's federal red tape that is slowing everything down. That red tape keeps the money from flowing from federal coffers into the transit projects, and includes, among other things, duplicate EAs. It's time to stop these non-productive agreements where all 3 levels of government pitch in, because it ensures that nothing ever gets done. Just leave it to the Province since a)Feds have no interest in giving any money, and b) Municipalities never have any money since they have no (or too few) taxing powers.

If we want their cash, we have to dance to their tune. That tax money belongs to taxpayers across Canada not just from Ontario and it should be accounted for accordingly. Hopefully, the recent comments about removing duplicate EAs, etc. will come to fruition.

It's not the composition of the board that's the problem. I think that there is actually more accountability to the Board when it is made up of elected representatives instead of private experts that aren't accountable to anybody and face no real consequences to their jobs from their decisions. You also need to get off this hang-up you have over LRT being the source of all evil.

IMHO, the board is problematic. Look at the RTP. They simply approved every dream project that every municipality had. Is that a coincidence? Not a single project could have been modified or eliminated or added? Amazing how they did not push the completion of the Sheppard subway or Bloor-Danforth extensions into Mississauga or to Scarborough Town Centre. That's not a 'vision' for the GTA. That's merely a blanket acceptance of what the municipal politicians on the board say. They need some professional planners, citizen reps and project managers on that board who can act objectively.
 
The title of the article and the topic relates to a projected Metrolinx shakeup in order to fast track projects. How does that warrant a rant against the feds? Sure they have their faults. But MacIsaac's comments certainly have a subtext about working with municipal politicians which in my view was the focus of the article.
If you actually read some of the quotes from the other politicians in the article, you'd see that they rant against the feds, too. And they're right, a lot of the delays we've seen in transit projects is attributable almost entirely to the feds. The most obvious example is TYSSE.



If we want their cash, we have to dance to their tune. That tax money belongs to taxpayers across Canada not just from Ontario and it should be accounted for accordingly. Hopefully, the recent comments about removing duplicate EAs, etc. will come to fruition.
Which is exactly why I'm saying that we should stop asking for their cash. If McGuinty hikes the tax rate back up 2%, there'll be enough cash without the feds.



IMHO, the board is problematic. Look at the RTP. They simply approved every dream project that every municipality had. Is that a coincidence? Not a single project could have been modified or eliminated or added? Amazing how they did not push the completion of the Sheppard subway or Bloor-Danforth extensions into Mississauga or to Scarborough Town Centre. That's not a 'vision' for the GTA. That's merely a blanket acceptance of what the municipal politicians on the board say. They need some professional planners, citizen reps and project managers on that board who can act objectively.

Did you know that the earlier drafts of the RTP had double the current pricetag? Did you know that the municipal politicians are making decisions based on the advice of the experts anyway? Did you know that the argument for an extension of BD to either STC or MCC is too weak in ridership? There's a strong argument for extending BD to East Mall, but that's as far as it can reasonably go at this time. In the east, they might want to extend it along Eglinton to Danforth Rd. and/or McCowan, but not to STC, as the cost-benefit is too weak. This is what the BCAs are about. The BCAs are prepared by the experts.

Your conspiracy theories are not convincing. There's been tons of expert input from professional planners, citizen reps, and the like. These are actually the same professional planners, citizen reps, etc., that helped devise the municipal plans in the first place, before Metrolinx adopted them. Despite doing duplicate studies on all the projects in existing municipal plans, Metrolinx staff drew similar conclusions as the municipalities. What a surprise!

We have to be realistic in what's in the best interests of the region in a cost-effective solution to the regional transportation problems. You're just talking about your own fantasy map that isn't a good solution for the region.
 
Did you know that the earlier drafts of the RTP had double the current pricetag? Did you know that the municipal politicians are making decisions based on the advice of the experts anyway? Did you know that the argument for an extension of BD to either STC or MCC is too weak in ridership? There's a strong argument for extending BD to East Mall, but that's as far as it can reasonably go at this time. In the east, they might want to extend it along Eglinton to Danforth Rd. and/or McCowan, but not to STC, as the cost-benefit is too weak. This is what the BCAs are about. The BCAs are prepared by the experts.

From what I recall reading there was no mention of subway in the BCA for replacing SRT to STC.

As for the Bloor extension west, the EA is already approved (as per the 427 PIC). And it's been on the books for what, 20 years now? Up to Dixie & Dundas at least. And do you know how much growth there has been in MCC since then? A subway to MCC would revitalize the entire Dundas Street corridor (which has enormous potential for urban growth).

For Metrolinx to support 2 subway extensions into York region and none into Mississauga is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Thanks CC. Railization you are entitled to your opinion but you won't find much support on this forum for the supposed objectivity of a board filled with municipal politicians. Even Steve Munro, no fan of subway extensions has pointed out the obvious flaws in the BCAs. Although, Metrolinx is a step above the status quo ante let's not pretend there's no biases at work here. Those BCAs are in agreement because they rehash TTC numbers. Let's see some more independent research. That would demonstrate Metrolinx's independence and integrity.
 
Metrolinx has turned out to be a completely useless organization. It should be abolished altogether.
 
From what I recall reading there was no mention of subway in the BCA for replacing SRT to STC.

Yep. I certainly appreciate Metrolinx's apparent objectivity and impartiality when they leave out an obvious option 5 (STC subway + Malvern LRT). If the option was apparently so weak and ineffective, or lacks ridership, why not stack against the metrics used in the BCA and prove it. Could it be that might have turned out better than they were willing to admit? Once again, Scarborough get's screwed....this time, however, the strap-on was named Metrolinx instead of TTC.
 
Transportation should be exclusively a Provincial and Municipal jurisdiction.

Intraprovincial transportation already is exclusively a provincial jurisdiction (as are municipalities). The province is free to step up and find public transit infrastructure. It is also free not to sign federal offers to shovel money at it for transit.

A really nutty idea, for instance, would be to add a percentage of sales tax for every dollar, and use it for that purpose. However, I can't imagine this happening unless the federal government were first to reduce the GST, leaving some tax room for the province to step in.
 
These are the types of people we need on the board... experts in planning, transportation, economics, and those with backgrounds from different transportation industries that can help other board members understand the implications of their decisions. During years with special events like the Olympics, trade meetings, World Expo etc there would be special representatives from those planning the events.

Translink Board

Dale Parker 3 years Chairman
Nancy Olewiler 3 years SFU Director of the Public Policy Program & Professor of Economics
David Unruh 3 years Director of Union Gas
James Bruce 2 years Chair of the 2010 Games Operating Trust Society
Sarah Goodman 2 years A VP at Weyerhaeuser
Robert Tribe 2 years Professional engineer
Bob Garnett 1 years Chartered accountant
Cindy Piper 1 years Urban planner
Skip Triplett 1 years Retired

TfL board
Boris Johnson was elected Mayor of London in May 2008.

Christopher Garnett is a member of the Board of the Olympic Delivery Authority and was, until August 2006, the Chief Executive of Great North Eastern Railway (GNER) and also Senior Vice President of the Rail Division of Sea Containers, GNER's parent company.

Peter Anderson is Managing Director of Finance at Canary Wharf Group plc.

Claudia Arney is currently Managing Director of Digital at Emap Inform, part of Emap, a business-to-business media group and the UK's leading trade exhibition organiser.

Charles Belcher has had 36 years in the rail industry, of which 14 were as Managing Director, including for West Coast Trains, Wessex Trains and Silverlink.

Tanni Grey-Thompson has competed in five Paralympic Games, winning 11 gold, four silver and one bronze medal. She has held 30 world records

Mike Hodgkinson has more than 30 years' experience in the transport industry

Judith Hunt is an executive coach and independent consultant specialising in innovative programmes on leadership, equality, race and diversity issues

Eva Lindholm has an extensive financial industry background

Daniel Moylan has been a Conservative councillor in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea since 1990 and has been Deputy Leader since 2000. He currently has cabinet responsibility for transport, planning policy and housing policy.

Steven Norris was the Conservative Party's candidate for London Mayor in 2000 and 2004. Before his nomination he was an MP for 14 years and Minister for Transport in London for nearly five years.

Bob Oddy has been a licensed taxi driver since 1966. He is currently General Secretary of the Licensed Taxi Drivers' Association

Patrick O'Keeffe has extensive experience in industrial relations. He is currently Deputy Regional Secretary for Unite the Union,

While working for the Nichols Group, Kulveer Ranger was a lead delivery manager of the Oyster card for London in 2003.

Tony West has been involved in the transport industry for more than 45 years

Keith Williams is Chief Finance Officer for British Airways plc and has been a main board director for the last three years.

Steve Wright, after an early career with London Underground, became involved in the private hire trade and successfully ran a private hire company for over 25 years
 

Back
Top