News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.2K     0 

S

samsonyuen

Guest
From: www.theglobeandmail.com/s...y/National
_______________
Quebec gets voice at UN organization
Pact will bolster national unity, PM says

RHÉAL SÉGUIN
QUEBEC -- Quebec may not be a nation in the eyes of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, but the province's "specificity" and "unique personality" give it the right to a formal voice at the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Yesterday, Mr. Harper and Premier Jean Charest signed an agreement that will give Quebec official representation in the Canadian delegation at UNESCO.

Quebec will be the only province with a "formal" voice at the UN body. Mr. Harper said he does not exclude the possibility of allowing other provinces a voice in other international forums. As if to prevent charges of pandering to Quebec, Mr. Harper insisted his government deals equally with all provinces.

"Federalism of openness does not mean playing favourites or stirring up jealousies, but it does mean that the time has come to forge a new relationship with the provinces," Mr. Harper said yesterday during the formal signing ceremony at the Quebec National Assembly.

The agreement symbolized the harmonious relationship Mr. Harper and Mr. Charest have developed since the Conservatives took office last February in an attempt to isolate the separatists with what Mr. Harper has called his "open federalism."

"This historic agreement represents neither centralization nor separation but an arrangement that symbolizes our vision of a strong, flexible Canadian federation," Mr. Harper said, adding that the agreement will bolster national unity.

Mr. Charest argued that the agreement is as much about provinces playing a more important role in the federation as it is about Quebec gaining a voice at UNESCO.

Mr. Harper is the first prime minister since Brian Mulroney to participate in a formal ceremony at the National Assembly. The UNESCO agreement was in keeping with a Conservative election promise and follows a federal budget that is committed to settling another of Quebec's demands, the fiscal imbalance, which has become a major irritant between Ottawa and Ontario.

Mr. Harper said Quebec's participation in the Canadian delegation at UNESCO is not a step toward a new round of constitutional talks nor is it recognition of Quebec as a nation in any form.

As a member of the Canadian delegation to UNESCO, Quebec will be allowed to express its position on issues of provincial jurisdiction, such as education and culture. In the event of a disagreement over a specific issue or treaty, the federal government's position will override Quebec's. However, the province alone will decide whether it proceeds with implementation in areas of its responsibility.

"We will be able to express our opinion at all times at UNESCO. . . .We will be able to speak freely, without any constraints," Mr. Charest said.

Mr. Harper warned that the UNESCO deal applies only if Quebec is willing to work within the federation.
 
Dear Mr. Harper,

Shut up you two-faced...



(fill in with your own profanity)



Sincerely get out of office,

citizen of an oil-free zone.
 
I guess Harper has always been a believer in "Asymetrical Federalism" afterall.

Now, when is Alberta going to get a voice at UNESCO?

AoD
 
Now, when is Alberta going to get a voice at UNESCO?


Don't you just wish that Klein would have the balls to demand it? Civil war among Alberta politicians would be so entertaining right about now!
 
bizorky:

Civil war among Alberta politicians would be so entertaining right about now!

I thought THAT already happened a month or two ago over Klein's early retirement and his subsequent abdication?

AoD
 
^Yeah, but I want some gun-totting, oil-spraying action. Maybe Myron Thompson with an uzi nailing the provincial legislature, or Harper decked out in leather ready to wrastle.

If they want to be obnoxious, they should be entertaining. To be boring is the worst sin of all.
 
All the while...

From: www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs...&t=TS_Home
_____________________
Is PM reneging on Ontario deal?
Election promise to honour $7B McGuinty-Martin agreement seems to be disintegrating
May 11, 2006. 05:23 AM
IAN URQUHART
QUEEN'S PARK COLUMNIST

Get ready for another front to open up in the war between the Queen's Park Liberals and the Ottawa Conservatives.
A year ago, Premier Dalton McGuinty and then-prime minister Paul Martin signed a deal that was supposed to bring an additional $7 billion in federal funding to Ontario.
In January, during the federal election campaign, Stephen Harper wrote a letter to McGuinty pledging to uphold the deal if he became prime minister.
"We will be fully funding this agreement," Harper said in the letter, a copy of which has been obtained by the Star.
Harper helpfully attached to the letter a spreadsheet setting out the details of the funding agreement, adding up to $7 billion over six years.
Now it appears the Harper government is reneging.
Ontario was counting on the money to help convert coal-fired power plants to natural gas, to expand public transit, to augment funding for universities and community colleges, and to bring the province up to the same level as the rest of the country in federal spending on immigration settlement and job training programs.
In a letter last week to Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan, federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty repeats Harper's assurances that the Conservative government "is committed to delivering on the financial commitments" in the McGuinty-Martin deal.
But the rest of Flaherty's letter is densely ambiguous and suggests some of the funding is contingent on "discussions with all provinces and territories on restoring fiscal balance in Canada." (Harper's January letter contained no such qualification.)
The spreadsheet attached to Flaherty's letter does not remotely resemble Harper's. Flaherty's firm numbers add up to just $4 billion. The remainder (almost $3 billion) is consigned to a column ambiguously entitled, "further amounts allocated," with a footnote that says "pending the outcome of discussions." As well, the $4 billion includes almost $1 billion in tax credits from Flaherty's budget last week.
This is not what McGuinty and Martin agreed to, say provincial finance officials. The agreement a year ago called for increases in either federal transfers to the provincial treasury or direct federal spending in Ontario, they say.
"The deeper I dig the more concerned I become," Duncan said this week when asked about Flaherty's letter.
In an interview yesterday, Flaherty dismissed Duncan's concerns. "Every nickel (of the McGuinty-Martin deal) will go to the province of Ontario," said Flaherty. "Anyone who makes a suggestion to the contrary is wrong.
"The province has nothing to complain about."
Flaherty, himself a former provincial finance minister, noted that his officials met Duncan's officials this week to explain the details of his letter. "They (Duncan's officials) were satisfied (with the explanations)," said Flaherty.
But provincial finance officials put a different spin on that meeting yesterday. They said the two sides basically "agreed to disagree."
Duncan is expected to make this clear with a letter to Flaherty later this week.
This dispute could escalate and drive another wedge between the two governments, already feuding over Harper's apparent slighting of McGuinty.
Meanwhile, McGuinty is reaching out to other premiers in a bid to prevent Ottawa from enriching the federal equalization program. In this fiscal year, Ontarians will pay $4.9 billion into the $11.5 billion equalization pool. Ottawa disperses that money to eight "have-not" provinces. Only Ontario and Alberta, as "have" provinces, do not receive equalization payments.
McGuinty fears that Harper will redress the fiscal imbalance by improving equalization. McGuinty said this would be "unfair to Ontarians."
That's a message he has delivered this week to B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell, Quebec's Jean Charest, Newfoundland's Danny Williams, Manitoba's Gary Doer, Saskatchewan's Lorne Calvert and Alberta's Ralph Klein.
 
Clearly Harper is no fool. Support for the Conservatives is soaring in Quebec, and he knows that this is where his imminent majority government will come from. Of course Toronto will be suitably punished.
 
But he is a fool if he dumps on Ontario isn't he? He can't win a majority without significant support in Ontario. And transfer payments are not just an issue in Toronto. The entire province feels it.
 
I agree. He has forty seats in Ontario. Losing those seats could erode most all his gains in Quebec. He's smart to be sucking up to Quebec, and incredibly moronic for appearing to be sticking it to Ontario. It's incredibly foolish.
 

Back
Top