News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 

ShonTron

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
13,249
Reaction score
11,937
I thought this was good for a laugh or two.

A `rural yahoo' talks back

Feb 06, 2008 04:30 AM
Randy Hillier

It is a rare occasion when an esteemed university political science professor demonstrates both intolerance and ignorance in a single interview. (Article referred to)

One recently left his comfortable academic chair and waded into the swamps of political leadership. Along the way his foot found the traps his mouth had set and his mind had baited. Had he armed himself with some knowledge of history and a measure of respect for others, the swamp and the alligators may have been avoided.

During an interview with the Star, the professor expressed significant bias and a large dose of disdain for rural Ontario, commenting that political leaders from the countryside are likely to be "rural yahoos." The professor further demonstrated his ignorance in stating that "smart people realize this." Most Canadians will find these statements both repulsive and ignorant.

Objective readers with a basic knowledge of Canadian history will recognize the falseness of the professor's statements. Canadian history is paved with a marvellous collection of rural leaders who helped build a prosperous, just society and, along the way, built the academic classrooms where generous paycheques abound. Sir John A. Macdonald leads this list, followed closely by farm kids Sir Robert Borden, Wilfrid Laurier, prairie populist John Diefenbaker and Baie-Comeau lad Brian Mulroney.

Great rural leaders are certainly not confined to federal politics. In Ontario, the rural cast includes farmer Mitch Hepburn, Frank Miller and Mike Harris, to name a few. Anyone looking at Canadian history through these misinformed academic eyes would have to conclude that Canadians are uneducated and have been led by, and voted for, a series of "yahoos."

Of course, many urban political leaders are sprinkled amid the cobblestones of political history, Stéphane Dion, Pierre Trudeau, Dalton McGuinty, Bob Rae and Paul Martin, for instance. However, just as it is false to denigrate leaders because they may hail from a small town or rural area, it is equally false to elevate or diminish a person's importance because they hail from the big city.

In October of last year, the professor characterized the Progressive Conservative party as the party of rural, small town and small-minded "Old Ontario." Apparently, the professor's liberal mind changes with the seasons, and would now like to refashion the Progressive Conservative party with metropolitan intolerance, slicked back with academic ignorance. I would remind the professor that Old Ontario laid the foundations, fed the masses and has a history of developing astute leaders in all levels of politics and governance.

On Jan. 9, John Tory tasked me to serve as the Progressive Conservative party's critic for the rural affairs portfolio. I have watched, with great angst, the McGuinty government's relentless assaults upon our rural economy, our rural institutions and the rural heritage of justice and culture of freedom that built this great province. The attacks on rural Ontario have been calculated and deliberate.

With great pride, I stand as an advocate for, and a citizen of, rural Ontario. Although, the current government has put the economy, culture and institutions of rural Ontario in its crosshairs, it is unacceptable for a university professor to promote this government's harmful rural agenda.

The professor needs to understand that it is not where you grow up but what you make of yourself that determines leadership skills. And I should not have to remind him that name-calling is the lowest form of debate.

Then again, maybe I'm just a "rural yahoo."

Randy Hillier is MPP for Lanark-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington.

----

Mitch Hepburn (famous for his "Sons of Mitch's"), Frank Miller (!) and Mike Harris. Great leaders all!

Uh, notice he didn't mention Lindsay's Leslie Frost?

John A. MacDonald, a rural politican? He grew up and practiced law in Kingston, one of the most important cities in his era.
 
Why the PC's ever let this guy run is beyond me...

main02-1.jpg
 
^ Because he was going to run as an independant and split the PC vote allowing the Liberals to win the riding otherwise. In the end he'll probably cause more problems from Tory then he's worth, but he has towed the party line and been quieter then expected thus far.
 
"There's more to Ontario than just Toronto" was his campaign slogan? I hardly think this guy has a foot to stand on. He's angry over the characterization of rural people as "yahoos" while at the same time running a campaign seemingly based on blind anti-urbanism, and using phrases like "metropolitan intolerance" and "academic ignorance". It's also worth keeping in mind that the professor he mentions is in no official position of power, but this man is representing us in government.

Digging back to John A. or any other politicians of that era and calling them examples of "rural leaders" is somewhat misleading, since back in those days Canada was overwhelmingly rural as a whole. It would be just as valid to suggest that John A. McDonald lived his entire life without using an iPod, so therefore we should look for new leaders who share that trait. It's misleading. And if Mike Harris is an example of a great rural leader, I suggest we build a wall around Toronto to save us from his successors.

The GTA currently has about 46% of Ontario's population, and that is expected to grow to 50% in the next two decades. If the interests of this area often seem to overshadow the interests of other specific rural areas of the province, it is only a simple matter of numbers, not a hatred of rural folks, who incidentally would benefit from a strong, stable, economically successful Toronto as much as anyone.
 
Brought to you by Randy Hilllier's group:

Landowners threaten clear-cut as protest

Landowners threaten clear-cut as protest
The Canadian Press

April 16, 2008

TORONTO -- Rural landowners are threatening to clear-cut a huge swath of land in Eastern Ontario to protest against the lack of compensation in the province's new endangered species law, an action that could leave an endangered bird homeless, the Ontario Landowners' Association said yesterday.

The province is forcing landowners to take drastic action - which will destroy the habitat of the endangered loggerhead shrike - by refusing to compensate people whose property values plummet and whose farming activity is curtailed under the law, said president Jack MacLaren.

"We're making a point," said Mr. MacLaren. "This legislation will have the opposite effect from what is intended ... You're forcing good stewards of the land, good stewards of the environment and therefore good stewards of endangered species to do the unthinkable."

The governing Liberals brought in new legislation a year ago that expanded the number of protected animals in Ontario and allowed scientists to determine which species should be added to the list each year. The Liberals set aside $18-million over four years for the law.
 
"We're making a point," said Mr. MacLaren. "This legislation will have the opposite effect from what is intended ... You're forcing good stewards of the land, good stewards of the environment and therefore good stewards of endangered species to do the unthinkable."


So lets see, the supposed "good stewards" are threatening to carry out a kind of scorched earth policy that would further threaten an endangered species they proclaim to be helping to protect.


It's clear logic is not their strong suit.
 

Back
Top