News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
34,640
Reaction score
32,814
City:
Toronto
From the Globe online:

Thomson in takeover talks with Reuters

ERIC REGULY

Globe and Mail Update

May 4, 2007 at 9:37 AM EDT

ROME — Thomson Corp. is in talks to buy Reuters Group PLC and hopes to strike a deal soon to buy the once high-flying British financial data and news provider, people close to the companies confirmed this morning.

The sources, however, denied that Thomson's effort to buy Reuters is in reaction to Rupert Murdoch's bid for Dow Jones & Co., owner of The Wall Street Journal in a rapidly consolidating media market. “Thomson is a big thoughtful company that makes long-range plans and doesn't do hostile deals,†said a source. “Reuters is not an instant decision on Thomson's part.â€

Rumours of takeover bids for Reuters have hit the markets every few years, more so lately because of the recent dramatic fall in the company's share price. This morning, after Reuters confirmed it had been approached by a suitor, the shares rose 26 per cent to 622 pence, valuing the company at about £7.8-billion.

The sources said Thomson sees a complementary fit with Reuters, a “hand-in-glove opportunity,†said one. Both are providers of electronic financial data. Thomson, through Thomson Financial, has a strong corporate presence in the United States and is popular among “buy-side†institutions. Reuters' products are popular in Britain and in continental Europe, especially among the “sell-side†institutions.
Thomson in takeover talks with Reuters

Sources confirm Thomson Corp. is in talks to buy Reuters Group PLC; Reuters shares surge after it confirms talks with unnamed suitor (Reuters)

Any negotiations to buy Reuters would be delicate because the presence of a “golden share†can be used to block unwanted takeovers. Furthermore, the ownership structure dictates that no shareholder can hold more than 15 per cent of the company. A takeover would be virtually impossible without the consent of the 15 trustees charged with ensuring the “independence, impartiality, integrity and freedom from bias†of the company.

An investment banker in London said he didn't think Rupert Murdoch would attempt a rival bid for Reuters. But he said the big private-equity players are bound to take an interest Reuters, a globally famous brand.

A purchase by the Toronto-based company would come just as it's disposing of its Thomson Learning educational division, expected to close by September. Analysts have said the division, which sells textbooks and educational software, could glean as much as $6-billion (U.S.).

Because of that sale, Thomson “has sufficient funds and sufficient credit lines to acquire Reuters,†said Denis Durand, senior partner at Montreal-based Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd., which holds Thomson shares.

“It would be possible and a good fit, but it's always a question of price and how fast it can have an impact on earnings.â€

Analysts said only a small number of companies could afford Reuters. At Friday's share price, it has an enterprise value (net debt and equity) of more than $18-billion. Reuters and Thomson Financial are direct competitors in some products. Combining the two would could create valuable synergies.

With Reuters at its side, Thomson would derive about 50 per cent of its EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization — from Thomson Financial, up from abut 30 per cent now.

With files from Tavia Grant.

AoD
 
Exactly! Canada spawned the Thompson empire, but the folks in Stamford, USA reaped the rewards. There is no Thompson global head office skyscraper in Toronto's CBD filled with thousands of high paid white collar workers. Toronto would be so much richer and dynamic if we could repatriate that company back home. Are you listening Thompson family?
 
Problem is the folks in Stamford are mainly Americans. You'd wreck the company by trying to move the company here as many of those Americans wouldn't want to move. The only only way it would happen is if the company spent a lot of money encouraging them to move. And the Thompson family didn't get to be so rich by spending money on something they don't need to do.
 
Problem is the folks in Stamford are mainly Americans. You'd wreck the company by trying to move the company here as many of those Americans wouldn't want to move. The only only way it would happen is if the company spent a lot of money encouraging them to move. And the Thompson family didn't get to be so rich by spending money on something they don't need to do.

It could be done gradually... Doing so would also be less disruptive to operations.
 
The Thomson Building was still there when I came to work this morning.

Well I guess Eaton's is a thriving Toronto enterprise, too, considering the massive complex bearing its name. The Thomson building has very few Thomson employees.
 
If its anything wall street related, and trying to compete internationally, being atleast in the tri-state area of NYC is required. Reuters is getting killed by Bloomberg, and Thompson doesn't even register with most wall streeters, makes sense to kick start #2 and #3 in the financial info market.
 
The Thomson Building was still there when I came to work this morning.

Very funny! I am sure it was still there. As I am sure you are aware, Thomson is ran out of Stamford, Connecticut, not that building in downtown Toronto with Thomson's name on it. If Toronto was the real head office, that Thomson building would be bursting at the seams with thousands of very highly paid professionals. It would be a nice addition to our financial services head offices, a nice addition to our tax base, and support a vast number of other jobs in law, accounting, etc.

A big loss for us.
 
As I'm sure you are aware, the head office of a company is not necessarily where the bulk of its workforce is. See, for example, the banks, Boeing, the mines, etc. Capital knows no borders - why should Lord Thomson be constricted by some provincial's fantasy?
 
While you perhaps admire David Thomson for his achievement of moving to the United States (and for the inherited peerage title that he doesn't use), the head office of the company is most certainly where most of the high-paid administrative workers are located. It's also where most of the spinoff consultant, law, accounting, etc. jobs are located.
 
I'm sure Halifax is happy that you just gave them most of the Bank of Nova Scotia's high-paid administrative empoloyees, as well as the spin off consultant, law, accounting, etc. jobs too. Their gain is Toronto's loss.

Likewise, all those Boeing engineers, technicians, etc. are going to have to pack up and leave Kansas, Washington and wherever else to move to Chicago now to be at the head office.
 
Yeah, would be, except...

Corporate Headquarters
Scotiabank
Scotia Plaza
44 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario

I'm sure that Halifax is rather worse-off for it, too.

Funny, I don't think that engineers and technicians are administrative employees. Nor are there many spinoff accounting or legal jobs from Boeing in Kansas.
 
"Although the general office was moved to Toronto in 1900, the head office is still in Halifax"
 

Back
Top