jackattack
Active Member
Agreed! Especially with 212 King immediately adjacent - the entire block could/will end up being very dense.Funny how 200m here feels short now thanks to the surrounding supertalls
Agreed! Especially with 212 King immediately adjacent - the entire block could/will end up being very dense.Funny how 200m here feels short now thanks to the surrounding supertalls
Unfortunately, they don't have a timeline for their new website yet.Amir Remtulla has registered to lobby on this one, on behalf of client Bentall Green Oak.
This one is at the OLT I believe, but with no updates there on cases appealed since June of last year.........we're in the dark on any movement there.
@interchange42 you were inquiring with the OLT on this (the lack of status updates on newer files) were you not?
Site Plan Approval application for a 61-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area 22,601 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 44,683 square metres. A total of 526 rental dwelling units are proposed.
I think if they kept the up and down above the copper portion as well it would look better. Variation is nice as those continuous long verticals can get to be too much, especially with the ones on 19 Duncan. Though I can appreciate your comments on this.It'd look great if HP scrapped the gap toothed curtainwall sections. The brick should be continuous.
Yes thats where traditional stepbacks wouldve been preferable to curtainwall cutouts.I think if they kept the up and down above the copper portion as well it would look better. Variation is nice as those continuous long verticals can get to be too much, especially with the ones on 19 Duncan. Though I can appreciate your comments on this