Taken 3 December.

IMG_2538.jpeg

IMG_2539.jpeg
IMG_2541.jpeg
 
propertyTO5 said:
Interior image of a North facing 2 bedroom 800sqft unit at 11 Yorkville.View attachment 613062
Click to expand...

flavakid32 said:
Not that impressive in my opinion. Developers in this area often rely on the address to sell, while delivering subpar products. I’ve viewed a few units in 8 Cumberland, and the workmanship is shockingly poor—honestly, below preschool standards. The quality of materials used is equally disappointing, practically non-existent.
Click to expand...
IT doesn't look too bad to me. However, I would prefer floor to ceiling windows.
 
We look, and we don’t judge—well, not too much but I have to say, whoever chose these color selections didn’t do the best job, in my opinion. Good luck keeping those floors clean! And wow, is that washer and dryer part of what’s supposed to be a luxury unit? The interior and closet doors give off a low-budget starter home vibe—not necessarily a bad thing, but let’s call it what it is.
IMG_6872.jpeg
IMG_6873.jpeg
IMG_6874.jpeg
IMG_6875.jpeg


On the bright side, the exterior of the building is sleek AF, and I really like it!
 
flavakid32 said:
We look, and we don’t judge—well, not too much but I have to say, whoever chose these color selections didn’t do the best job, in my opinion. Good luck keeping those floors clean! And wow, is that washer and dryer part of what’s supposed to be a luxury unit? The interior and closet doors give off a low-budget starter home vibe—not necessarily a bad thing, but let’s call it what it is. View attachment 620640View attachment 620641View attachment 620642View attachment 620643

On the bright side, the exterior of the building is sleek AF, and I really like it!
Click to expand...
Which floor now? What’s the occupancy date ?
 
On the interiors, as posted by @flavakid32

1) The bathroom looks pretty nice, not exactly my taste, but it works.

2) Floor being that dark could be an issue, as the footprints illustrate, though, of course, if one has wet/dirty footwear, it really ought to come off at the door.

3) The Kitchen has decent finishes, but its sooooo small. I can't imagine entertaining from that kitchen, and even storing my dinnerware, cookware and glassware would seem a challenge, not sure where the food would be stored.

4) The soffits/variations in ceiling heights is way, way too much. The variations are everywhere.

5) The building aspires to deco'ish, and old-school hollywood glam. The bathrooms, kitchens and floors at least read as roughly in-line w/that. The washer and dryer do not...... neither to the baseboards, whose lines are too simple and modern.

6) All the pulls/handles are in something like a brushed nickle. I actually like that as a choice and tend of to find a more brassy look as just a bit too kitsch / o'er the top. Yet, if you're doing the psedo-deco/glam look, I think something in the brass family was probably needed for contrast w/all the dark colours.
 
flavakid32 said:
We look, and we don’t judge—well, not too much but I have to say, whoever chose these color selections didn’t do the best job, in my opinion. Good luck keeping those floors clean! And wow, is that washer and dryer part of what’s supposed to be a luxury unit? The interior and closet doors give off a low-budget starter home vibe—not necessarily a bad thing, but let’s call it what it is. View attachment 620640View attachment 620641View attachment 620642View attachment 620643

On the bright side, the exterior of the building is sleek AF, and I really like it!
Click to expand...
I despise those half glass panels in the shower that make it impossible to adjust the water before getting in. The controls should be on the opposite end.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top