Does this project have one or two staircases? It must be awkward for developers knowing what to include knowing that this is changing soon but not quite yet!

Two -- one internalized at the front, and the second externalized at the rear. Everyone I know is assuming single stair is too much of a fight until/if it's actually real.
 
^My only comment is that the west wall should be built with the assumption that the adjoining lot will be redeveloped. Easy design solution.

It sort of is, depending on how comfortable you can get yourself with what an acceptable condition is. As proposed, if the lot immediately beside this were to propose more or less the same form as is proposed here, you'd wind up with the staircase basically right up against a wall, or right up against another exterior staircase. That's less of a problem on this one because all the units are designed as dual aspect, but you likely wouldn't be able to make that work on the site to the west because you don't have the laneway to take advantage of there.
 
To bring this back to the current proposal..........all you need to do is sell Planning on what could be on the adjacent lot, not what you yourself will build.

I think that's exactly right (and I do think it will be a very tough sell with Planning), and I think one argument in favour of this proposal would be to say that this specific lot calls for a different built form than the mid-block lots specifically because it abuts a laneway on its side (and that the building design responds to that context).
 
Does this project have one or two staircases? It must be awkward for developers knowing what to include knowing that this is changing soon but not quite yet!
Two. One inside at the south end, and another at the north end. Most impressive is that this is all through-units with external access.

I wouldn't count on those code changes coming too quickly. There's still lots of intransigence on permissible height and how wood can be counted towards fire-rating.
 
I see this being approved as it is very central and to my knowledge similar proposals have been approved. Also this is likely a design that is being included in the long-awaited catalogue of pre-approved buildings as Dubbledam is one of the participating firms.

And we haven’t even broached how people will react when they try to open a restaurant on the ground floor! Lol
 
Last edited:


14 Grange Avenue Community Consultation Meeting

Monday, December 9, 2024 6:00 PM - 7:30 PM
(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

Register for webinar

If you want to attend, register now. When your registration is approved, you'll receive an invitation to join the webinar.
Register

Host

Shaylyn Costello

Agenda

Amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law for 14 Grange Avenue. The proposal is for a new 6-storey residential building with 42 units.
 
It sort of is, depending on how comfortable you can get yourself with what an acceptable condition is. As proposed, if the lot immediately beside this were to propose more or less the same form as is proposed here, you'd wind up with the staircase basically right up against a wall, or right up against another exterior staircase. That's less of a problem on this one because all the units are designed as dual aspect, but you likely wouldn't be able to make that work on the site to the west because you don't have the laneway to take advantage of there.
Does the rear laneway (to the north of all properties on this block) not resolve the matter of the back stair case being up against a wall? This proposals back staircase doesn't actually empty out onto Grange Pl (north-south laneway) but instead the one I mentioned above shared by all houses on the block.
1733019849773.png
 

Back
Top