- Thread starter PMT
- Start date
cd concept
Senior Member
Koops I love your work ! But I've noticed watching the flyby that 119 Church st proposal is sitting on Queen st road instead of its location at the south east corner of Church and Queen.And 88 Queen development should be pushed in as well off of Queen st. Just a thought if you care to fix it when you got the time thanks !
Koops65
Senior Member
It's fixed now, thanks for pointing those problems out for me...
A Torontonian Now
Senior Member
The current state of the site, today:
artyboy123
Senior Member
The podium has some new rendering. The unit count changed from 472 units to 464 units. The bike parking was reduced from 477 bikes to 469 bikes.
Info and new podium rendering was taken from the architectural plan via SPA.
Info and new podium rendering was taken from the architectural plan via SPA.
khris
Senior Member
Looks great. But it's Pemberton, so it's gonna be awful. I have zero faith in them. I wish they would just go away. Also, I highly doubt they will use curved glass here for the windows or balconies. If they do, well, I'll be shocked.
Found the tower renders too
Found the tower renders too
TossYourJacket
Senior Member
Given this is G+C and Pemberton, we can probably assume the renders are downplaying the amount of grey spandel that will be present here. Also no way the curved glass on the balcony guards ends up happening.
Amare
Senior Member
I'm not even paying any attention to the renderings, knowing the two proponents involved this is going to end up being gutter trash through and through. The facendectomy we're being shown is a hint of what's to come.
UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
Renders already hint that they won't be using rounded glass for the corners here. So assuming they're going with this, the corners won't be squared off...but they sure won't look pretty either. /sigh
hasibf
New Member
Not sure if anyone asked this already but will the clinic on Dalhousie still be operational or is that part of the property and thus will be demo'd? From the renders, it looks like it's not part of the property in question