It is maybe worth re-reading (or, in my case, reading) the DRP comments from the initial presentation in July 2019. The summary reads:
4.3 Consensus Comments The chair then summarized the Panel comments on which there was full agreement.
Building
• The Panel felt comfortable with the proposed modifications to the street-wall datum in finding a consistent height, and rotation of the west tower massing to align with podium
• Consider setting back the upper podium floors of 162 Queens Quay East (that abut the property line with 178 QQE) westward to create a visual gap between the two podiums and thus clearly define the consistent lower podium street-wall height
• Consider opportunities for combining, consolidating, and sharing parking ramps, loading and servicing areas between the various buildings
Landscape
• Explore options for the treatment of the future east-west street – consider severing it at the north-south P.O.P.S. with a green strip that has views down to the water, eliminate traffic through street, and encourage stronger pedestrian use as a common outdoor “lobby” for the various residential entrances.
• Consider shifting northeast lobby to the future east-west street, or provide corridor access from Sherbourne Street, to support the street-wall condition that is consistent with 215 Lake Shore Boulevard East.
• Consider alternatives to rolled curb-edge detail
• Consider mapping the emerging network of east-west pedestrian connections and identify opportunities for continuity
Sustainability
• Provide more information and explore improvements in sustainability strategy
• Explore feasibility of building to tier 2 or 3 TGS standards
More details of their presentation in the Minutes on WT website.