[AntiYimby]

I did not know that!

 

[Koops65]

Large towers seem to get multiple revisions before being built. I can't see this one not being similar.

 

[Bayer]

Here is hoping that we possibly get a redesigned shorter Tower because this thing is ugly

According to the decision, the revised building would have 99 floors instead of 94, but the actual height is unspecified.

 

[Amare]

Let's hope this gutter trash proposal never sees the light of day. It's insipidly horrid, in every way, shape and form imaginable, and would be absolutely dreadful to live in.

 

[UtakataNoAnnex]

...I'll take that this will be long time and a dog's life before they build it for the silver lining here.

 

[Strange Advance]

Other than the issue of the dearth of elevators, which is a serious one, I don't get the hatred for the design itself. I find it rather handsome.

 

[christiesplits]

Other than the issue of the dearth of elevators, which is a serious one, I don't get the hatred for the design itself. I find it rather handsome.

I find the slightly sloped crown very peculiar. It should be at a steeper angle or not exist at all.

 

[Lenser]

I'd be ok with that crown - it's subtle and I like the gentle deviation from all things perpendicular.

The elevator issue - that's another thing. In any case, it would seem that whatever ultimately goes in there will likely be quite different.

 

[Paclo]

According to the decision, the revised building would have 99 floors instead of 94, but the actual height is unspecified.

The OLT did not modify the height from the settlement with this interim order so the listed height in the database of 317.4m remains accurate (see elevation drawings in my post here, and the March '24 settlement here).

That being said this decision gives them some additional leeway for building maintenance protrusions and 2.5m for architectural feature protrusions