Automation Gallery
Superstar
Yeah but to some anything away from the box in Toronto is just a fantasy...lol
- Thread starter Marcanadian
- Start date
north-of-anything
Active Member
I love how the setbacks are proposed to be in unison with the building just south of it. If only the Remenyi proposal could follow suit.
MoObserves
Active Member
The Remenyi proposal is clearly an exercise is asking for the full 3D limits of your lot and seeing what you can get. I'm sure that proposal will be trimmed down on all sides.
That being said, I think there's an amazing opportunity here to build a stretch of interesting facades on tights lots, in an organic and design-forward way. Similar to the design effect being done at Mirvish Village in an organic city growth kind of way and without it being one big building masquerading as many.
The Preservationist
Active Member
More importantly than the new structure does anyone know if the museum tavern is going to relocate?
Midtown Urbanist
Superstar
Too bad that we will lose some retail restaurant space here, though it is nice that (medical) office is being retained.
xy3
Active Member
I like this design but based on how they handled 60 Colborne, I don't have high hopes.
I hope the Remenyi proposal gets a design change- it's too cold and industrial looking for this stretch.
I hope the Remenyi proposal gets a design change- it's too cold and industrial looking for this stretch.
ChesterCopperpot
Senior Member
60 Colborne was Freed/Carterra and designed by aA.
None of them are involved in this project.
None of them are involved in this project.
And they did a pretty great job with it AND they're still not involved with this project.
42
Undead
Senior Member
0 for 2
Northern Light
Superstar
Preliminary Report to the May 19th meeting of TEYCC.
From said report:
From said report:
ushahid
Senior Member
so in short it's rejected.
ProjectEnd
Superstar
This was always going to be decided at LPAT.
innsertnamehere
Superstar
Completely unsurprising. Also completely contradictory given adjacent applications and approvals.
ptbotrmpfn
Senior Member
What a loss in a project. This had great style and would have made the area 10x nicer. It would have looked beautiful at street level. Is there a way or Can we get a listed of examples or something of what is to be realistically expected style wise for towers and structures in this city. Or pass a law that say you can only produce a render of what would be approved. And then built. This process of here our idea ... no try again... here’s our new idea... no try again. This is a ridiculous waste of time money and effort.
Last edited: