It is rare for amenity furnishings to be identified in, but I suppose when infill development is coming to an existing apartment site and that building currently has no amenities for its renters, the local City Councillor wants to ensure that the space that they've negotiated for the tenants actually comes with some worthwhile features to make their lives better… and not just empty space.

42
 
39C3876B-40D9-44BD-943A-FBF20BDD3091.jpeg

Not much going on with the new build on the property, but the original building’s concrete appears to be getting a paint job.
 
This is one of those situations where it would make sense as a true mid-rise and be doubled in height. One block away City Council has approved 60 storey buildings. Why not allow more mid-rise near these ghastly, inhumane towers?? City planners seem almost sadistic the way they encourage these abrupt cliffsides in the urban environment. It's like their goal is to make people insane.
 
J Martin said:
This is one of those situations where it would make sense as a true mid-rise and be doubled in height. One block away City Council has approved 60 storey buildings. Why not allow more mid-rise near these ghastly, inhumane towers?? City planners seem almost sadistic the way they encourage these abrupt cliffsides in the urban environment. It's like their goal is to make people insane.
Click to expand...

What possessed you to lift this thread from dormancy? No one has posted here, until now, since 2022?
 
Since the thread got bumped.......

I see no permit evidence to suggest this proposal was ever pursued.

The last posted AIC link is no longer valid.,

****

While looking at the permits, I did notice this for the adjacent, connected building on Gloucester:

1772141091124.png


Well that seems sensible, doesn't it?

I wonder how their insurance company would feel about that........hmmm.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top