Why would you ask someone to torture us with pictures of Downtown Markham? The horror!!!

:)

But are you actually basing that on anything or was it a joke as I supect.

I do see it quite often and to me it has great potential. None of the building are all that great on their own but they're pretty nice overall (quite a bit of attention to detail). But the potential lies in the density / BRT / retail / central square ... so on so forth.


btw - you should see the new Viva bus stops ... it looks like a prison :) - they're huge!
 
It was a joke, but I do find the townhouses to be horrendous. Not only is each townhouse block fugly, it's repeated over and over and over again. The other buildings are ok, but that's pushing it.

There's potential in the overall development, but I am skeptical of it being built by one developer/builder. It will be interesting to see how they pull off the central square / "Main Street" with retail and other uses.
 
Is this proposal dead dead? East of Warden on HWY 7 is already claimed by the uninspiring Times condos (rivara?). this plot is like the last frontier in this particular stretch that hasn't been touched yet. Interested to know what it might be?
 
It looked like they put topsoil by the new sidewalk and now vegetation is growing.
IMG_20150820_095458.jpg
IMG_20150820_095422.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150820_095458.jpg
    IMG_20150820_095458.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 1,599
  • IMG_20150820_095422.jpg
    IMG_20150820_095422.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 1,514
the new soil and grass has nothing to do with the owner/developer here, those works are part of the Region's program to complete the VIVA transitway along Highway 7
 
Not sure if this is still up to date, but this project appears on Topfar Development's website:



View attachment 328833
I was able to find the forum that already existed for these lands https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...tyn-dev-13-2-x-15-16s-hca-architecture.12207/ - In 2011, Stonebridge sold this portion of their large plot of land (Which seems that they sold all of it at this point - with 100 Clegg being owned by New World Centre developments. This portion was bought by Jason Kaptyn Hospitality, which seems to have connections with Topfar, here: https://markham.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Shortlist/index.html?appid=691f92c442b64655985b3c8dc9a7d2fc However, I was not able to find new documents that have Topfar listed anywhere, and only has Brivia listed as a developer here. Topfar can very well be apart of it, considering that the massing, the block layout, and the amount of floors that the image portrays above seem to be consistent with what the newest proposal and re-zoning applications have to say.
 
Based on the documents, it looks like Lemay is the architect here. Will be interesting to see how this progresses. The Brivia Group look to be more established in the Montreal condo market, with several relatively large projects in the works over there.

 
Last edited:
I was able to find the forum that already existed for these lands https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...tyn-dev-13-2-x-15-16s-hca-architecture.12207/ - In 2011, Stonebridge sold this portion of their large plot of land (Which seems that they sold all of it at this point - with 100 Clegg being owned by New World Centre developments. This portion was bought by Jason Kaptyn Hospitality, which seems to have connections with Topfar, here: https://markham.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Shortlist/index.html?appid=691f92c442b64655985b3c8dc9a7d2fc However, I was not able to find new documents that have Topfar listed anywhere, and only has Brivia listed as a developer here. Topfar can very well be apart of it, considering that the massing, the block layout, and the amount of floors that the image portrays above seem to be consistent with what the newest proposal and re-zoning applications have to say.
Thanks for doing all that investigating! I've combined the two threads, and we'll make whatever changes as needed as we learn more!

42
 
Public Meeting on October 5, 2021

From the Notice: https://www.markham.ca/wps/portal/h...c-on-behalf-3555-hwy7-dev-ltd-co-brivia-group
PROPOSAL

The Applicant is proposing a mixed-use development consisting of one 53-storey tower and two 40-storey residential tower with a total of 1,134 residential units, and a gross floor area (GFA) of 3,410 m2 (36,705 ft2) of commercial uses, 3,535 m2 (38,050 ft2) of office use, and a 500 m2 (5,382 ft2) day care centre.



The Applicant is seeking to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit site-specific policies and development standards pertaining to heights, density, setbacks, parking, and uses.
 
Approved via Settlement, OLT Decision:
https://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/OLT-22-004154-OCT-25-2023.PDF

On September 18, 2023, the City and Appellant reached a settlement on the final planning instruments.

The Settlement Proposal was based on the following revisions:
a. Three tower elements set on two distinct four storey building podiums, with tower heights of 45-storeys and two 38-storeys towers.
b. Up to 1,250 residential units, a total Gross Floor Area (“GFA”) of 110,431 square metres (“m2”)., including a residential GFA of 101,394 m2, a nonresidential GFA of 9,037 m2, and a total density of FSI of 10.0.

Ms. Hare reviewed the Settlement Proposal consisting of redeveloping the Subject Property into an urban high-density mixed-use development set within an enhanced public realm that includes streetscaping and gathering spaces animated by retail, grocery, commercial, fitness, day care, and restaurant facilities within three tower elements set on two distinct four-storey building podiums. The following are key elements of the redevelopment:
a. The podiums include structured parking (above-ground parkade) of a maximum height of three-storeys measured from grade and will be partially lined with active uses or architecturally integrated treatment.
b. The maximum height of the eastern tower element will not exceed thegreater of 45-storeys or 169 metres (“m”) measured from grade. The maximum height of the remaining tower elements will not exceed the greater of 40-storeys or 150 m. The maximum floor plate sizes for the non podium floors will be up to 850 m2
c. The maximum proposed overall site density will not exceed 10 FSI
d. The maximum proposed GFA will be 110,431 m2. The GFA calculation excludes any structured parking (above-ground parkade). The proposed development includes the following GFA breakdown: i. Residential and amenity uses of a maximum GFA of 101,394 m2.ii. Non-residential uses GFA (including, but not limited to commercial, retail stores, and day care uses) of a minimum of 9,037 m2
e. Up to 1,250 residential units, composed of a mix of studio to three-bedroom dwellings are proposed. 100 residential market rental units, to be located within Phase 2 of the development, are proposed, and will be composed of a mix of studio to three-bedroom dwellings.
f. A parking ratio of a minimum of 0.6 spaces/unit for residential uses, 0.1spaces/unit for visitors, and 1 space/100 m2 for non-residential GFA is proposed.
g. A bicycle parking ratio of a minimum of 0.8 long-term spaces/unit and 0.2short-term spaces/unit for residential uses and 0.2 long-term spaces/100 m2and 0.15 short term spaces/100 m2 for all other non-residential uses.
h. Phase 1 of development will include a 45-storey tower, which will include underground parking levels, situated at southwest corner of Highway 7 and South Town Centre Boulevard.
i. Phase 2A of development is proposed to include a 38-storey tower and the western podium building, including both structured parking and underground parking levels.
j. Phase 2B of development is proposed to include a 38-storey tower located on the shared western podium.

The Tribunal is satisfied that the Settlement Proposal and the requisite OPA and ZBA constitute good land use planning and are in the public interest.

The Tribunal allows the appeals and approves the OPA and ZBA instruments
 

Back
Top