YIMBY519
Active Member
New renderings and built form adjustments from the Site Plan: http://app.toronto.ca/AIC/index.do?folderRsn=+WpO0cxYE15/0UwoUM+dRA==.
Info on changes:
Info on changes:
I guess it's important to note it's also been appealed for lack of decision. No surprise there. The City and proponent are likely far apart in terms of what is considered contextual here.New renderings and built form adjustments from the Site Plan: http://app.toronto.ca/AIC/index.do?folderRsn=+WpO0cxYE15/0UwoUM+dRA==.
Info on changes:
View attachment 352500
View attachment 352499
The likely reason we're seeing the resubmission is that the proponent and City have been working towards a solution, that this is what the proponent is suggesting in that regard, and which the City may be fine with. If that's the case, we could see the proponent and City settle, and the OLT hearing become a settlement ratification hearing (over in a day, approval rubber stamped).I guess it's important to note it's also been appealed for lack of decision. No surprise there. The City and proponent are likely far apart in terms of what is considered contextual here.
The likely reason we're seeing the resubmission is that the proponent and City have been working towards a solution, that this is what the proponent is suggesting in that regard, and which the City may be fine with. If that's the case, we could see the proponent and City settle, and the OLT hearing become a settlement ratification hearing (over in a day, approval rubber stamped).
42