Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
40,817
Reaction score
125,699
The proposal here is an infill, purpose-built rental tower, with retention in full of the existing rental building on site.

Ste as is, per Streetview:

1757345953501.png


The App:


From the above:

1757346218226.png


1757346182058.png


1757346143725.png


1757346108368.png


1757346068497.png


1757346272095.png

1757346299929.png

1757346326918.png

1757346343834.png

1757346393478.png


Site Plan:

1757346435786.png


Ground Floor Plan:

1757346500494.png



Elevator Ratio: 4 elevators - 456 units or 1 elevator to every 114 units.
 
Thanks! So is the new infill apartment zoning reform approved yet and if so will it make this easier?
 
Are we playing a Sim City game of how many towers we can jam into a single node before it literally burst it seams?

Honestly I think there needs to be a development tower ban in St.James Town, this is just lunacy at this point.

Speaking to this proposal: nobody wants or asked for this foolish "parkland" dedication on site. Or the sad and sorry outdoor "amenity" space. Any development even contemplated in this neighborhood should be forced to bring a major community benefit, because this neighborhood (already the densest in Canada) is already jammed past any reasonable point and is maxed out.
 
Totally agree with Amare. I lived there in the early 80s then in the early 2000s, getting any denser will be an issue. Just ridiculous, there are other areas that could use this.
 
Are we playing a Sim City game of how many towers we can jam into a single node before it literally burst it seams?

Honestly I think there needs to be a development tower ban in St.James Town, this is just lunacy at this point.

Speaking to this proposal: nobody wants or asked for this foolish "parkland" dedication on site. Or the sad and sorry outdoor "amenity" space. Any development even contemplated in this neighborhood should be forced to bring a major community benefit, because this neighborhood (already the densest in Canada) is already jammed past any reasonable point and is maxed out.
Agreed, this is an obscene treatment of the neighbourhood, especially when the City has made almost ZERO public realm improvements to physically fit all these new ppl. The rate at which we shovel the cost of intensification and economic growth on quite literally the poorest postal codes in the city is outrageous.

1757949740450.png

Why does Howard Street, chock full with hundreds of below grade parking spaces, with hundreds more on the way, have a sidewalk barely wide enough for two to walk astride, all so we can fit a few dozen more parking spaces? Areas in NYC with comparable densities (and even those degrees lower) have sidewalks 3x the width of our pathetic curbs, full with trees.
1757949915974.png
 

Back
Top