City of Toronto and CreateTO to break ground on 705 new residential homes​

 

City of Toronto and CreateTO to break ground on 705 new residential homes​


@EastYorkTTCFan would you care to explain why you're angry about lots of new rental apartments, the majority market-based, along with some additional affordable units?
 
No space and who's paying for it? The Two closest elementary schools are crescent Town which is around 100% and then Secord Elementary school which is at 100% for the main building and has a portable pack that was added on plus additional portables. The jonour high school in the area is over 100% with a few portables as well.
This site is on the east side of Victoria Park Avenue, so this development would be going to Oakridge Junior PS, Samuel Hearne MS, and Birchmount Park Collegiate. From some Google sleuthing, only Oakridge appears to be over capacity.

Not that we should be holding up the construction of buildings with predominantly 1-bedroom apartments over school capacity, anyways...
 

City of Toronto and CreateTO to break ground on 705 new residential homes​

Believe it when I see it.
I recall Tory holding a presser to “break ground” at the Warden site back in 2021 and nothings ever been built 🤣
 
Whatever it's still in a bad spot and plus they didn't make people in the area completely aware of it until it was too late to make any changes. Create To sucks as well they don't give feedback on Twitter and they have no way to actually contact them to voice concerns. This project is going to be dangerous to people who are trying to use the subway station and sidewalk around it well it's under construction.

With respect, this project was launched with much fanfare under former Mayor John Tory.

There was pre-application consultation by CreateTO; then there was a Planning Application and even more consultation. This thing has taken years and years to get off the ground and tons of residents have provided input. This thread is 7 years old!

If you missed each and every opportunity to voice your concerns, I'm not sure how that's on anyone else. I'll throw CreateTO under the proverbial bus for any number of sins, but lack of public input here is not one of them.

***

On 'danger' during construction...........I don't see why that would be any worse than any construction site anywhere else. While there will be some construction vehicles entering/exiting the site, this is offset by all the cars that will not be.

You can argue for/against the development, that's fine. You can argue about details, from height to streetscape to unit mix as to whether an optimal solution has been arrived at, but the argument that 7 years of public process was insufficient or that the construction poses undue danger to the public is more than a stretch.
 
Last edited:
I have to agree with @Northern Light . Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but opinion cannot cloud the facts. Some of points above with respect to this development are simply factually inaccurate. This is a good location for development - it's connected to transit, and makes use of a surface level parking lot to provide more housing. The area needs investment (this is my opinion, and people may argue against this - I'm ok with that). Consultation was conducted - fair is fair. Like it or dislike it, the process was transparent with ample opportunity for input.
 
Create To sucks as well they don't give feedback on Twitter and they have no way to actually contact them to voice concerns.

Did you even look?

 
Unfortunately the information wasn't given out to people in the area or at least ones who use Victoria Park station until they put up signs announcing the closing of the parking lot.

Of course, you use UT.........

But that aside, there was a Planning Application sign posted at the station site for years.

Public notice under the door in the mailbox of everyone within 150m is standard and there was lots of media coverage.

In all sincerity, what greater level of notice is required? Its expensive to do mail-outs, what distance is sufficient 200m? 300m?

I'm genuinely sympathetic to the idea that people should be able to give informed input; but I'm struggling with the idea that a reasonable effort wasn't made here.
 
Unfortunately the information wasn't given out to people in the area or at least ones who use Victoria Park station until they put up signs announcing the closing of the parking lot. Also if they have been planning this for 7 year's why did they only decide to inform people who use Victoria Park a few months ago. This is just another example of the city's consultantion process not being good at all as by the time anyone who is nearby to something like this actually finds out about it it's too late to change anything or complain about it.
Once again, this is simply inaccurate and incorrect. There was a development application sign on site for years . The public consultation information was shared in local media, such as beach metro, and flyers were delivered by mail to residents within a certain catchment area. These are simply the facts. Residents can chose to be aware and involved of things that are happening within their city, or not. That's a choice, but it's incorrect to say people were not informed, or the option to participate was not provided.
 
Unfortunately they have started working on this so we're going to be stuck with more condos here.

Rental apartments, not condos.
I mean - if you are going to be outraged - at least try and get *some* information correct.
 
There was a development application sign on site for years .
proof
1750777471269.png
 
Unfortunately they have started working on this so we're going to be stuck with more condos here.
Not really stuck, it’s a perfect site for housing. Just skeptical on the project actually starting and finishing
 

Back
Top