- Thread starter rdaner
- Start date
AlbertC
Superstar
artyboy123
Senior Member
Anger after Toronto shuts down tiny development proposal for the second time
A proposal to construct a small residential building northwest of Toronto's Bathurst and Bloor intersection has been refused for a second time, spa...
www.blogto.com
ProjectEnd
Superstar
Absolutely infuriating nonsense. CoA is such an absolute NIMBY clown show.
HousingNowTO
Senior Member
HousingNowTO
Senior Member
...as mentioned in the BlogTO article - our volunteers had helped to arrange at least One (1) unit at 91 BARTON as an "Affordable Rental" unit for 25-years --- with ZERO government support, and that could have grown with help from the City and CMHC...
AlbertC
Superstar
HousingNowTO
Senior Member
TLAB appeal allows the project to proceed... with conditions...
goodcitywhenfinished
Active Member
Finally.
AlbertC
Superstar
A win for new missing middle housing in this city is good news in my books.
HousingNowTO
Senior Member
junctionist
Senior Member
It's not always NIMBY, but it's definitely the municipal body that can make municipal governance seem broken and dysfunctional. For instance, council enacted a bylaw that prevents people from paving over their entire yards.
It's a great idea to restrict that practice because fully-paved yards result in more stormwater runoff. They exacerbate flooding issues in storms and the urban heat island effect during heatwaves. They also reduce a neighbourhood's greenery and can preclude tree planting, thereby making neighbourhoods less attractive.
But all it takes is a minor variance to get around the bylaw when building a new home. The committee of adjustment will often grant the variance even if someone objects and cites the bylaw.