First time seeing these rendering views:



View attachment 458707View attachment 458708
i can already see the value engineering in these renders. appears grey instead of Black or is it just me?
 
Adding some recent photos to the forum

342D0BE2-F689-4379-B517-9CDEDDC8D444.jpeg
E19992FA-B73B-44DB-BCAF-B99ADD957CF0.jpeg
7891008A-C888-44AE-A676-782039D066C5.jpeg
3D8D71CD-6B35-4DF0-9C68-525C60F0872C.jpeg
B68A6F19-6E14-4221-A243-A1446FBEF291.jpeg
964B204E-A805-448C-83C7-079DD50255F7.jpeg
348FB674-C486-4E56-90FB-274348405CC1.jpeg
393277D6-2870-49A8-B6CC-E6A7450E502A.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey all: Alias has a website which includes a 3-D model of their project. In comparing this with the plans as submitted and approved in 2018, I find a discrepancy in representation of the southwest corner of the main tower. In the approved plans, it is clearly displayed as being curved. Yet in the new online model it is built as a sharp 90-degree angle. Is this the type of design change a builder could make on his own, without approval?

Alias planned footprint.png
ALiAS - projects overhead.png
 

Attachments

  • Alias planned footprint.png
    Alias planned footprint.png
    316.6 KB · Views: 64
  • ALiAS - projects overhead.png
    ALiAS - projects overhead.png
    199 KB · Views: 69
But according to the revised plans submitted and approved by the city in 2018 - the most recent AFAIK - the southwest corner is curved. Please see page 27. So, either there was a more recent submission to the city (if so, when?), or they were in error, or the developer is ignoring them. Which is it?
Take a look at page 32 where you'll find the enlarged plan. Just so you know, these are just preliminary drawings. For instance, this document only shows 5 residential elevators, but in reality, there will be 6.
 

Back
Top