Can't people decide for themselves what to think of it? Those that even bother to notice it, that is.

Of course, but knowing the intent can improve one's appreciation (or at least one's understanding) of the result. Take the work Straight by Ai Weiwei recently shown at the AGO. Knowing the context made his pile of rebar more than just visually interesting. And it is a heritage building after all; a word on its history would be appreciated.
 
I know it's said a lot, but damn, Scotia is one fine looking tower.

The east crane has nearly reached ground level now:

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr

Bay Adelaide Centre East by Marc, on Flickr
 
East crane coming down today.

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    857.7 KB · Views: 1,745
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    866.7 KB · Views: 1,739
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    583.2 KB · Views: 1,729
I swear Mom, I just found it there lying on the ground!

attachment.php


Looking closely at the center of the fake windows, one can see a shiny surface behind the facade panels, which look quite flimsy in person. Could these be temporary?

attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 20150518_151619.jpg
    20150518_151619.jpg
    735.3 KB · Views: 1,488
Last edited by a moderator:
Last Friday:

IMG_20150515_133627.jpg



IMG_20150515_133741.jpg



IMG_20150515_134110.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150515_133627.jpg
    IMG_20150515_133627.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 1,305
  • IMG_20150515_133741.jpg
    IMG_20150515_133741.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 1,342
  • IMG_20150515_134110.jpg
    IMG_20150515_134110.jpg
    968.8 KB · Views: 1,291
Of course, but knowing the intent can improve one's appreciation (or at least one's understanding) of the result. Take the work Straight by Ai Weiwei recently shown at the AGO. Knowing the context made his pile of rebar more than just visually interesting. And it is a heritage building after all; a word on its history would be appreciated.

Except that architecture is fundamentally different from an exhibit in a gallery. A piece in a gallery is only seen by people who seek it out. It has no impact on anyone else. Architecture, OTOH, is a functional piece of the built fabric of the city that people use every day. It affects people and the streetscapes around it. Gallery art can be abstract and not have any real function while architecture doesn't have that luxury. Architecture can be art, but by its very nature it's an art form for the masses. If functionality is sacrificed for artistic expression then it fails as architecture.

In any case, I haven't seen the ghost wall for myself.
 
So MisterF, bypassing any debate over your supposition re: architecture, are you insinuating that in this case that functionality has been sacrificed? Please expand.

42
 
From yesterday:

DSC00283.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • DSC00283.jpg
    DSC00283.jpg
    185.3 KB · Views: 741

Back
Top