Marcanadian
Moderator
CASA III by Marcus Mitanis, on Flickr- Thread starter AlbertC
- Start date
CASA III by Marcus Mitanis, on Flickr
DSC02161
DSC02160
DSC02158
DSC02157
Miscreant
Senior Member
Thanks for the big upload today. Great shots.
Benito
Senior Member
No problem.
drum118
Superstar
July 15: Just got around getting photos I shot before going away.
Is that all going to be one hugely thick raft slab? Wow I think.
42
42
drum118
Superstar
Aug 15
Stupidandshallow
Active Member
Meant to post this a while back... From Urbanation on Twitter:
Moving north looks like Cresford Developments is developing more on Charles St E, buying 69 Charles & 69 Hayden for $12M
https://twitter.com/Urbanation/status/623132296569196544
Hopefully this land assembly isn't for a Casa 4... could be difficult with the heritage buildings.
Moving north looks like Cresford Developments is developing more on Charles St E, buying 69 Charles & 69 Hayden for $12M
https://twitter.com/Urbanation/status/623132296569196544
Hopefully this land assembly isn't for a Casa 4... could be difficult with the heritage buildings.
khris
Senior Member
I hope not! It's bad enough we're getting 3 of almost the same thing. So boring.
ProjectEnd
Superstar
It would be 66 Charles that they bought. It's a heritage listed 2 ½ storey Second Empire home now used as lawyers' offices, and it backs onto 69 Hayden.
The proposal would be to preserve 66 as is. To the west of it, 62 and 64 are being preserved as part of the Casa III development, enlarging the total property so that Casa III's fsi was not too outrageously high. This would be the same case here, and I wouldn't be surprised if we also heard that Cresford bought the final properties on the block north of the Manhattan site—640, 642, 644 Church—and proposed to preserve them as well, all in aid of putting a taller tower on the 69 Hayden lot. That would also give them the separation they'd need between this proposal and Casa III and Manhattan.
Manhattan, as you may know, preserves the front of 68 and 70 Charles and 628 to 636 Church. It's sacrificing 638 Church to get a driveway into the back of the properties where the drop-off, servicing, and garage entry will be located.
42
The proposal would be to preserve 66 as is. To the west of it, 62 and 64 are being preserved as part of the Casa III development, enlarging the total property so that Casa III's fsi was not too outrageously high. This would be the same case here, and I wouldn't be surprised if we also heard that Cresford bought the final properties on the block north of the Manhattan site—640, 642, 644 Church—and proposed to preserve them as well, all in aid of putting a taller tower on the 69 Hayden lot. That would also give them the separation they'd need between this proposal and Casa III and Manhattan.
Manhattan, as you may know, preserves the front of 68 and 70 Charles and 628 to 636 Church. It's sacrificing 638 Church to get a driveway into the back of the properties where the drop-off, servicing, and garage entry will be located.
42
raclll
Active Member
Crane is up!
philofra
Active Member
Benito
Senior Member
