AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Exactly my point. But there seems to be a few people that want to report it to the historical board and planning department because it alters the original CN tower. They remind me of the architect of Roy Thompson hall complaining about the Toronto symphony changing the interior of the hall so they actually sound good. Sometimes changes to buildings are good.
That's not your point. Do we know the changes will be good (beyond what's believed to be good on the part of CLC)? Do you know that this will be one of the instances of that "sometime"? And in this instance, there isn't even a hint of public knowledge about this - unlike the fairly openly discussed Roy Thompson Hall interior changes.
Also, given the quality of the changes to CN Tower, particularly the ground pavilion - it's more than fair to look at the proposal by CLC with a more critical eye.
AoD