1Ć0 said:
I wonder how this impacts the sale of the properties immediately to the south now...

100-122 Dundas West | 59s | For Sale

Not sure if there is a record for this property, but it is for sale by Colliers (next door to CreateTO site) -
urbantoronto.ca urbantoronto.ca
Click to expand...
Are you talking about the flight paths? While the revision from January did kill the second tower here, the Dundas site south is largely unaffected (though the small shaving on the north side has been taken into account on their massing):

1732211272708.png
 
Thanks for this PE. Not so much concerned about the flight path impacts, but rather whether this updated proposal for the terminal site sterilizes the development opportunity for the Dundas/Bay fronting site/s. The previous tower proposal gave some more breathing room to the south and east. This new update looks like its very close to the property line, so not sure what you can do to the south anymore...

1732211663692.png


1732211680428.png
 
Last edited:
interchange42 said:
"REPORTER GOES BACK FOR MORE"

Re "the previous proposal" @1Ć0, that earlier image was just created as something to give bidders an idea of possibilities, it was never more than that.

42
Click to expand...
Thank you. I always thought the tower on the terminal site was to be situated as close to Elizabeth St to allow for a tower at the corner of Bay/Dundas.

We will have to see if a 59 storey tower is still viable there... or any tower

1732213725794.png
 
From a design aspect, neither of these towers looks particularly innovative IMO. As for the shorter of the two, I have only two words...beyond uninspiring.
 
I'm finding this aesthetically pleasing, subtly fitting in well within its surroundings, which is all I would ask it to do. Now if someone could develop the lot to the north...
 
Doppleganger said:
From a design aspect, neither of these towers looks particularly innovative IMO. As for the shorter of the two, I have only two words...beyond uninspiring.
Click to expand...
I agree that doesn't seem to be Studio G's best offering, IMO...but I am assuming the quality of materials and design will make up for that shortfall. And assuming also that there's no further work in progress on this proposal side.
 
UtakataNoAnnex said:
I agree that doesn't seem to be Studio G's best offering, IMO...but I am assuming the quality of materials and design will make up for that shortfall. And assuming also that there's no further work in progress on this proposal side.
Click to expand...
Patience, young grasshopper - we have not reached The Cheapening™ phase yet.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top