khris
Senior Member
Those numbers probably include mechanical floors. UT does not include those in the floor count.Thread title needs to be updated- 79s + 68s
Those numbers probably include mechanical floors. UT does not include those in the floor count.Thread title needs to be updated- 79s + 68s
Thread title needs to be updated- 79s + 68s
Those numbers probably include mechanical floors. UT does not include those in the floor count.
I actually like these towers. The colour it will bring to the skyline will be really appreciated from my part. I do agree that something better could of been designed, but I do like them regardless.
Unfortunately the height on this one will make these towers stick out even more and it will be very difficult to hide its appearance on the skyline. Concord has built numerous towers around the same area and they all look vastly similar. I'm sorry but it's very hard to support the repetitive garbage they put up, if this was their 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th tower I would accept it. But they've had numerous chances to actually change things and they keep putting out mediocre towers at best. The best development CityPlace has seen at this point is Canoe Landing Park. But hey, at least we have Park Place to look forward toThough I agree that they could be better, I think the height is exciting and the artwork could be interesting. I have found some of the art they choose terrible some good. Colour would be nice regardless. That much I'm sure we can count on. I'll complain when there is something concrete to complain about.
For those out there that hate cityplace so much, just be thankful its almost over. I've always appreciated their pioneering efforts, and variances in design, albeit great design or not.
These architects need to be fired imho they lack creativity.
I don't think it has anything to do the architects... Rather Concord maximizing their profit by spending less for more.
They could have easily get this project in design competition, and allow the public to choose the winner. This could have been expensive by City Place's standard but they could also definitely sell out for any price demanded for a landmark design.
It's too bad that these towers have to rely on superficial decoration to give it character. What's even more troubling is that this decoration is just a placeholder and not a piece of artwork that is thoughtfully integrated with the design of the building and vice versa. It would be nice if an appropriate artist was chosen early on in the building design and work with the architect in the process.