The difference is we know that Cresford most likely would've used quality materials for the most part, Concord on the other hand will go to the local developer flea market to source everything and this will likely be bland* as a result.
You are right, nothing has changed from Cresford rendition except few changes at lower and main level inside podium and Chinese voodoo floors number changes for tallest residential building marketing purposes Plus material changes.It will be out before Christmas according to insider.
And a Lada isn't much different from a Mercedes. lol
Lada are currently producing good quality cars, and even Mercedes has produced absolute garbage (2000s A class comes to mind).
themotordigest.com
It was an analogy. Not a scientific comparison. Whatever Zang. The point was that these "minor" changes that Concord have made have really cheapened the overall effect of the building. That's all.Lada are currently producing good quality cars, and even Mercedes has produced absolute garbage (2000s A class comes to mind).
Driven: what modern Lada cars are like behind the wheel | Autocar
We sampled the Lada X-Ray SUV and Vesta Cross saloon. Should you still be cracking Lada jokes?www.autocar.co.uk
Top 10 Worst Mercedes Models - The Motor Digest
We rounded up the worst Mercedes models in this article. Explore and discover why they made it to this list.
But that's all based on conjecture, right?
*sigh* Some people here complain a building is worthless based on the colour of the spandrel or mullions, so…
My point is that it's Concord that's ultimately in control of the purse strings of this project irrespective of the fact of whether aA is the architect, and we've seen it time and time again in recent history where they use the cheapest materials possible. There are some occasions where a project looks good despite the architect who is involved (ie: Fitzrovia and G+C with The Parker), but this is not the case with Concord.