daniel_kryz said:
Any idea as to why construction was delayed?
Click to expand...

My best guess is what @DSC said in his post, here: (after last years budget)

David Crombie Park Revitalization | ?m | ?s | City of Toronto

Block 7 aside, why is there so much hardscaping?
urbantoronto.ca urbantoronto.ca

Depending on how you want to read those numbers above from this year, the slippage is just a year (though a lesser sum budgeted than in '21); or the slippage is a bit greater, with the previous project divided into two.

Though, if you read the project numbers, neither of this years listings match last year's project number; and the total budget appears to have dropped 5M.

But as I noted, Parks has a truly bizarre way of accounting for projects that I very much dislike; its quite convoluted, and can be needlessly confusing!

The tendency to break things into sub-projects also inflates project workload and cost.
 
Last edited:
This seems an apt spot to drop this:

1649516752445.png
 
Northern Light said:
This seems an apt spot to drop this:

View attachment 391505
Click to expand...
Now that the closing date has passed (May 10th) when can we expect an announcement about the winning architect firm? I am really hoping for Claude Cormier based on what we got for Berczy. This feels very 50/50 in terms of ending up like Berczy or otherwise Sherbourne common based on the preferred concept plan. It could be iconic based on how much space there is to work with (the length of 6-7 city blocks) but I am worried about the execution.
 
urbanexplorer said:
Now that the closing date has passed (May 10th) when can we expect an announcement about the winning architect firm? I am really hoping for Claude Cormier based on what we got for Berczy. This feels very 50/50 in terms of ending up like Berczy or otherwise Sherbourne common based on the preferred concept plan. It could be iconic based on how much space there is to work with (the length of 6-7 city blocks) but I am worried about the execution.
Click to expand...
I would expect we might hear about bidders and winner in September, it would be great to have Cormier but I suspect not.
 
DSC said:
I would expect we might hear about bidders and winner in September, it would be great to have Cormier but I suspect not.
Click to expand...

The winner just got the tender at Bid Award on January 11th.

It is not Cormier.

It is SLA

(IBI local partner)

1674679888465.png


Not a lot of $$$ here, so expectations will have to be tempered.

****

For interest's sake, this is the full list of bidders:

1674679967034.png
 
The new design is out today, and Stephanie Calvet has a good Front Page story about it, here:

urbantoronto.ca

David Crombie Park Redesign | UrbanToronto

Internationally renowned landscape architecture and urban design firms, Copenhagen-based SLA and Toronto-based Arcadis have joined forces to create a vision for the redesign and revitalization of Toronto’s beloved 40-year-old David Crombie Park.
urbantoronto.ca urbantoronto.ca

Arcadis has a page up on the project as well, that can be found here:

www.arcadis.com

SLA and Arcadis unveil David Crombie Park redesign

Arcadis collaborated with SLA to redesign the historic David Crombie Park in the heart of Toronto, integrating placekeeping and Indigenous elements.
www.arcadis.com www.arcadis.com

Renders from the above link:

1716827537274.png


1716827560823.png


1716827580578.png
 
I thought this was going to be a full redesign, but it looks like a BIG touch up project instead?
 
tripwire said:
I thought this was going to be a full redesign, but it looks like a BIG touch up project instead?
Click to expand...

To the extent that is true, and I think it is in some respects, I think that's a good thing.

This is and has been one of Toronto's better and more successful greenspaces over the years, one that was just a bit long in the tooth, with some of the paving/brick/concrete over 50 years old and showing its age, play equipment due for replacement, flower beds that need a refresh, and then the desire to add/integrate a few novel improvements like the Cycle Track, more pedestrianized/beautified cross streets, and some design changes that ease future maintenance and improve accessibility.

No need for a gut job.
 
Northern Light said:
To the extent that is true, and I think it is in some respects, I think that's a good thing.

This is and has been one of Toronto's better and more successful greenspaces over the years, one that was just a bit long in the tooth, with some of the paving/brick/concrete over 50 years old and showing its age, play equipment due for replacement, flower beds that need a refresh, and then the desire to add/integrate a few novel improvements like the Cycle Track, more pedestrianized/beautified cross streets, and some design changes that ease future maintenance and improve accessibility.

No need for a gut job.
Click to expand...
Agreed the bones are great. should look amazing with the refresh and updated bike path
 
Imagine if Rail Deck Park w/o the NINE condos had shovels in ground or even completed by now. Toronto could have been the envy instead of a dumping ground for critics. Money & funding were the big issues i suppose, but private donations & the philanthropic society for the public realm, in this wealthy big city, has always been lacking, comparatively. Also, some big criticisms of park maintenance?
Yes!! It matters that the last 13 yrs in Toronto were run by the cost cutting, slashing, parochial, good enough horde.
 
I genuinely hope this project turns out well. Everyone was so excited by the Nathan Phillips Square revitalization that was focused on restoring the original design but with enhancements.

The end result, while an improvement overall with the stage, restaurant and washrooms, highlighted the weaknesses of the original design as well. There's a vast expanse of concrete in front of City Hall that's sterile and boring. The overhead walkways remain problematic from an operational standpoint and are often closed to this day.

Here, we see the preservation of the cast-in-place concrete walkways with rather sparse bands of brick. We should be using more granite and stone in our public spaces. It lasts a long time and makes for higher-quality public realm. Bare concrete retaining walls look cheap and utilitarian.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top