Can you elaborate on that? I know East Harbour Station and the various transit connections (Ontario Line, GO Expansion) are being built by Metrolinx, but is the land-use being dictated by the Province as well?
Minister’s Zoning Orders (MZOs) have been issued for most of the TOC sites including East Harbour for the Ontario Line and others, thus the planning approvals are provincial.
 
While you're not wrong, it's not our fault that Cadillac Fairview decided to take the risk and acquire the site from Great Gulf while full well knowing the obligations here.

The city should stick to their guns here.
I mean "sticking to their guns" will only result in an undeveloped site here. Nobody is going to build money-losing office buildings for no reason.

This project was questionably ambitious even before COVID destroyed the office market. Now it's effectively impossible.
 
Minor variance as in, "We don't need stinkin' offices no more?" 🙀
No, that change has not formally been submitted... yet... but it will come -- likely before the next Provincial election.

These are the Ten (10) x MINOR VARIANCES that were at CoA last week ...

1727888951501.png

1727888978494.png
 
While you're not wrong, it's not our fault that Cadillac Fairview decided to take the risk and acquire the site from Great Gulf while full well knowing the obligations here.

The city should stick to their guns here.
Cadillac Fairview "knew" when they closed on this transaction on September 25, 2019 that the world was going to change more than any event since perhaps WW2 on March 14, 2020?
 
I mean "sticking to their guns" will only result in an undeveloped site here. Nobody is going to build money-losing office buildings for no reason.

The site needn't be built out all at once, indeed, it was always envisioned as a phased project rolling over 7+ years

There is certainly a case to be made for shifting large office buildings to a later phase, I'm not sure there' any argument for cutting them entirely or reducing them greatly. CF has a sufficient time horizon on behalf of its owners to landbank for a decade or more on portion of the site.

The office market recovery in Class A space downtown is also underway.......and will pick up steam shortly.

Its B and C buildings whose numbers will lag for some time to come, and many of those will be converted or torn down.

A new Class A building here beside a brand new Transit Hub will fill, by 2030'ish.

This project was questionably ambitious even before COVID destroyed the office market. Now it's effectively impossible.

I don't agree. I think if you said, doesn't make sense fiscally in the near term.........that I could support.
 
Cadillac Fairview "knew" when they closed on this transaction on September 25, 2019 that the world was going to change more than any event since perhaps WW2 on March 14, 2020?

I would start by saying, in general............a deal is a deal even when it stinks.

Can you imagine the government going to a private sector partner after having struck a deal that is binding and saying, "ya know, the politics and the budget outlook have changed, we don't think you should hold us to our contractual obligations.........and that being met with a 'Sure, we'll be happy to chop are margin in 1/2'......... I mean you couldn't have known things would change" .

If you can, please refresh me on when that happened.........

Elsewise, while I'm happy enough to concede that CF could not have foreseen the state of the office market in 2024, in 2019, I'm unclear on why that should be the City of Toronto's problem.

****

That said, I'm happy to consider reasonable accommodation on phasing and push the office building out by 4-6 years to align with market recovery and with the opening of the East Habour Transit Hub.

But any benefits associated with that first phase as currently written should still be paid upfront and credited on the back end.

CF can afford it.
 
It was undoubtedly ambitious in the pre-covid market. IIRC the 10,000,000 of office space originally planned here represented about ~10 years of office space absorption across the entire GTA market, and was proposed by a single landlord in a single location which is not exactly the most desirable office location in the city, albeit a good one. Perhaps not impossible, but absolutely highly ambitious.

I never stated that I thought office space here should be eliminated. Ultimately however CF is still officially planning 10,000,000 of office space here in a market which will be lucky to see an absorption rate at half that of the pre-COVID market and which is experiencing a "flight to quality" - i.e. new space around Union Station.

I do think we will see office starts again within a few years, but less in less prime areas and all starts at a slower pace than before COVID. I imagine that yes, CF could manage to fill a few buildings here over the long term. But not anywhere close to 10,000,000sf.
 
Given that the site is at a Transit Hub which is 1-STOP to Union Station, Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Rogers Centre and Scotiabank arena... and only 2-STOPS to Exhibition Station, Convention Centres and BMO Field -- I would hope (and expect) to see CF convert some of their "Office-Employment" buildings over to "Hotel-Employment" buildings to maintain some of the "EMPLOYMENT LANDS" without having to be dependent upon "back-to-work" standards at Bay Street type firms.

 
It was undoubtedly ambitious in the pre-covid market. IIRC the 10,000,000 of office space originally planned here represented about ~10 years of office space absorption across the entire GTA market, and was proposed by a single landlord in a single location which is not exactly the most desirable office location in the city, albeit a good one. Perhaps not impossible, but absolutely highly ambitious.

I never stated that I thought office space here should be eliminated. Ultimately however CF is still officially planning 10,000,000 of office space here in a market which will be lucky to see an absorption rate at half that of the pre-COVID market and which is experiencing a "flight to quality" - i.e. new space around Union Station.

I do think we will see office starts again within a few years, but less in less prime areas and all starts at a slower pace than before COVID. I imagine that yes, CF could manage to fill a few buildings here over the long term. But not anywhere close to 10,000,000sf.

I'm happy to agree w/the above..........but w/the proviso that given the phasing and time horizons here, I think any significant, overall, reduction in office commitment here is premature.

Push the first tower back a bit in the timeline........we'll revisit what to do w/towers 2 and 3 etc. closer to the window where those obligations would kick-in.

***

Given that the site is at a Transit Hub which is 1-STOP to Union Station, Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Rogers Centre and Scotiabank arena... and only 2-STOPS to Exhibition Station, Convention Centres and BMO Field -- I would hope (and expect) to see CF convert some of their "Office-Employment" buildings over to "Hotel-Employment" buildings to maintain some of the "EMPLOYMENT LANDS" without having to be dependent upon "back-to-work" standards at Bay Street type firms.


I'm certainly not averse to more hotel space, seeing as the City is well short of the needed level of supply and would be even shorter still if we rightly cracked down on the short-term rental market.

As to whether that should result in an overall reduction of office space over the full-term of site build-out...........I think I'd rather play the wait and see game; and simply say, I'd accept that swap out on office tower one, (mixed office/hotel) then lets see where the market is at when we get to the obligation for subsequent towers.

Of course, if CF were to voluntarily increase its affordable housing commitment, I might take a more sympathetic view.
 

Back
Top