condovo
Senior Member
Given what's going on across the street with Menkes' godawful "in.DE," I'm not very hopeful about this, to say the least.
Double flatiron!! ?
Not bad, but needs some refinement- though it's still likely in its early stages.
Indeed, why can't they simply renovate/update the existing Fillmore structure and build a beautiful garden with waterfalls on the adjacent parking lot rather than add on the top? Aside from maximizing profit of course.Why can't they simply renovate/update the existing Fillmore structure and build on the adjacent parking lot rather than add on the top? Aside from maximizing profit of course.
Because i don't think that anyone in their right mind would pay a whopping $31.5 million dollars for that space to do that?Indeed, why can't they simply renovate/update the existing Fillmore structure and build a beautiful garden with waterfalls on the adjacent parking lot rather than add on the top? Aside from maximizing profit of course.
If you are referring to my comment above, it was NOT mocking of your opinion but actually agreeing with your statement/comment. "Aside from maximizing profit of course. " Maximizing the profit is what companies do (or try to do) so we must expect them to come up with proposals that extract the last drop of it from every site. Unfortunate? Yes. Unexpected? No.It seems that some valid comments here are mocked just for the fun of it. I get it. However there are many on this site that 'freak out' when façadism is proposed when there is a valid option as there is at this site. The comment mocking my option/opinion is childish and ridiculous.