I guess this means they're not regrading Wallace. I thought I saw some drawings earlier that showed it going down by ~0.5m?

I recall that also. Going back to message #2122 in this thread, there was ML documentation (since taken down) saying the clearance at Wallace was to be 4.4 m. But the sign on the bridge now says 5.0m. Maybe they changed something to avoid having to put that dip in the roadway?

- Paul
 
Fresh paving where Paton goes under. Taken 17 August.

IMG_6893.jpeg

IMG_6894.jpeg
 
Not sure if this has been covered yet but when do they intend to finish the second track? its been a while since anything has come up for that.
 
Not sure if this has been covered yet but when do they intend to finish the second track? its been a while since anything has come up for that.
The second track is (basically) done.

But it's not of much use without being connected at each end.

Dan
 
The second track is (basically) done.

But it's not of much use without being connected at each end.

Dan
If Metrolinx keep their promise to hold existing service levels at current total daily movements until electrification, is there any real advantage to them spending the money to cut in the switches and amend the signalling prior to that?
 

Back
Top