innsertnamehere

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
19,308
Reaction score
22,637
City:
Toronto
approved development at 560 Grays Rd in Stoney Creek, on a currently vacant lot. This was approved as a 4-storey building in 2016, with a variance approved in 2019 to increase the height to 6 storeys, and radio silence since.

8KACOSb.jpg

N6oGfR0.jpg
 
New Updated renderings for 560 Grays Rd, the category has changed from condo to urban townhouses, floors has changed from 6-Storey condo to 4 x 4-Storey condo townhouses, units changed from 150 to 94, parking has been changed from 249 to 113 and the Architect is Arcadis not KNYMH

The renderings is from last month open house

IMG_2768.jpeg
IMG_2769.jpeg
 
The stats in the database have been updated to reflect the formal consultation of 2023 (FC-23-090).

New Updated renderings for 560 Grays Rd, the category has changed from condo to urban townhouses, floors has changed from 6-Storey condo to 4 x 4-Storey condo townhouses, units changed from 150 to 94, parking has been changed from 249 to 113 and the Architect is Arcadis not KNYMH

The renderings is from last month open house

@Branden Simon , could you provide a source for the rendering and site plan?

The rendering appears to have been used for Rosehaven's "Urban Towndominiums at Mount Pleasant" development at 175 Veterans Drive in Brampton:


1701887368485.png

1701887342014.png
 

Attachments

  • 1701887375098.png
    1701887375098.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 7
From bad to awful. Seriously, who comes up with these site plans? They’re dreadful. I don’t know how anyone looks at either of them and concludes that that is the best we can do here.
 
The stats in the database have been updated to reflect the formal consultation of 2023 (FC-23-090).



@Branden Simon , could you provide a source for the rendering and site plan?

The rendering appears to have been used for Rosehaven's "Urban Towndominiums at Mount Pleasant" development at 175 Veterans Drive in Brampton:


View attachment 525107
View attachment 525106
@Paclo The Renderings and the site plan is from last month’s November 20 meeting so I emailed the city council Ward 10 for additional renderings.
 
From bad to awful. Seriously, who comes up with these site plans? They’re dreadful. I don’t know how anyone looks at either of them and concludes that that is the best we can do here.

Indeed *wrinkles face*

it's all blockitecture now - just a series of nested boxes - that's all anyone knows how to do now.
 

Back
Top