DirectionNorth
Active Member
And historic SFH.Let’s be honest that the sight of transit is a blight on the Brampton communities world class streetscape.
And historic SFH.Let’s be honest that the sight of transit is a blight on the Brampton communities world class streetscape.
I was in contact with someone in contact with the higherups at Brampton, and the reality is even sadder. Brampton has listed in their 2040 Vision that the transportation priority in their region is Pedestrians > Cycling > Transit > Cars, and they're following that as literally as they can. The options shortlisted for this extension are A) Surface Level in Mixed Traffic, or B) Underground. Why Mixed Traffic? Because if its in its own separate lanes, they can't reduce the number of lanes on Main Street from 4 to 3 to give cyclists their own dedicated lanes. In other words, transit is being completely thrown in the dirt in favour of cycling.Let’s be honest that the sight of transit is a blight on the Brampton communities world class streetscape.
I was in contact with someone in contact with the higherups at Brampton, and the reality is even sadder. Brampton has listed in their 2040 Vision that the transportation priority in their region is Pedestrians > Cycling > Transit > Cars, and they're following that as literally as they can. The options shortlisted for this extension are A) Surface Level in Mixed Traffic, or B) Underground. Why Mixed Traffic? Because if its in its own separate lanes, they can't reduce the number of lanes on Main Street from 4 to 3 to give cyclists their own dedicated lanes. In other words, transit is being completely thrown in the dirt in favour of cycling.
This comes from a verbal confirmation with the head of Brampton's Official Plan Review Team, so unfortunately I do not have a written source. Take from that as you will.It should be noted that the "2040 Vision" document is just that. A vision document. The City of Brampton is going through an Official Plan update and updating its Transit and Transportation Master Plan. Those two documents probably give a more comprehensive overview of the context. Have you seen in any staff report for any road/LRT/BRT/BRT lite project since the start of this term the literal use of "Pedestrians > Cycling > Transit > Cars"? Happy to read if you have.
Also, isn't the use of "completely thrown" a little bit of an exaggeration? Even with the two block portion of surface mixed running, there will be some advantages to the LRT on Main and Hurontario compared to today's existing condition.
Considering its a metrolinx project, probably not. Plus that corridor doesn't seem to struggle with space as much as Main Street, although the downtown segment near Main Street might be cut down. Its entirely possible that at least with the current city council, the BRT lanes in downtown Brampton might be cut in favour of bike lanes.^ In terms of that so-called prioritization, what about Queen St and the BRT planned there? Are you concerned that bike lanes will be added as part of that project and there will be negative impacts to the proposed BRT there? Are there any other transit routes where you are worried that cycling infrastructure will be prioritized over good and evidence-based transit?
I thought it was also as I saw all kinds of material stock pile for ducking. I know for sure the section north of CP track was done as that was one area I saw the most of all. Going south I saw very little of it yearly. The gas line work has taken a lot longer to the point extra work was done that wasn't originally plan or require, Still doing work at the Queensway and to be completed in a few months.I thought the telecom and other underground cables were moved already over the last two years.