afransen
Senior Member
With how much still needs to be done, it is hard to believe that Q4 2024 substantial completion will be achieved.
It will not happen as there so much to do in the next 13 months. Look at how much of the guideway is in place considering been 11 months since work started on it and the remaining area is 1.35% larger along with building the 403 overpass, rebuilt the 407 overpass and finishing the elevated section. No OS in place and another 10(?) substations to be install.With how much still needs to be done, it is hard to believe that Q4 2024 substantial completion will be achieved.
They’re part of the government. They are going to keep things as close to the vest as possible. Maybe transit nerds know the time frame is off but the general public is at least under the impression things are going smoothly.Weird that Metrolinx is still repeating Q4 2024 substantial completion as recently as a month or two ago when that looks challenged.
Just from a comms and expectation management perspective, given the troubles with Line 5, you'd think they wouldn't want another example of a "this line is supposed to be done now and we don't know when it will be" situation.They’re part of the government. They are going to keep things as close to the vest as possible. Maybe transit nerds know the time frame is off but the general public is at least under the impression things are going smoothly.
Then you have the government admitting they messed up two projects at the same time. I just don’t think they want to admit that.Just from a comms and expectation management perspective, given the troubles with Line 5, you'd think they wouldn't want another example of a "this line is supposed to be done now and we don't know when it will be" situation.
Also, given that this line doesn't have the excuse of Line 5's complexity, what do we think explains the delay? Shortage of labour/resources?
It seems to me that they're not even done relocating utilities along big stretches.
it's entirely possible that Metrolinx has information that we don't have and they're confident in the timelines that they're being given. Port Credit Station and the QEW were always going to be the most technically challenging and time-consuming sections of the project, once those are substantially complete I expect we'll see more visible and rapid progress.Then you have the government admitting they messed up two projects at the same time. I just don’t think they want to admit that.
Then you have the government admitting they messed up two projects at the same time. I just don’t think they want to admit that.Just from a comms and expectation management perspective, given the troubles with Line 5, you'd think they wouldn't want another example of a "this line is supposed to be done now and we don't know when it will be" situation.
Also, given that this line doesn't have the excuse of Line 5's complexity, what do we think explains the delay? Shortage of labour/resources?
It seems to me that they're not even done relocating utilities along big stretches.
anything is possible and I’m optimistic. But the Ontario government isn’t exactly open with their communication these days so it’s fair to be skeptical.it's entirely possible that Metrolinx has information that we don't have and they're confident in the timelines that they're being given. Port Credit Station and the QEW were always going to be the most technically challenging and time-consuming sections of the project, once those are substantially complete I expect we'll see more visible and rapid progress.
Big projects typically have milestones, and if the overall project is going to be late you will often have a clue when those milestone dates are being missed.You may be overthinking it on communications. Metrolinx may know the contractor is behind, but the contractor is saying they are on schedule and will make a date. Metrolinx has to take the contractors at their word and can't go publicly accusing the contractor for being behind until it happens.