Why would that matter?

Because despite the efforts of 3XN and Safdie in the later phases, the majority of waterfront architecture is comprised of 1.) Badly aged B-tier architecture from the 70s-90s 2.) Window wall rent-a-box condos 3.) Suburbia-tier office park architecture; all of which squander the naturally beautiful qualities of their sites?

New renderings are circulating showing at least some of the facades covered in ivy. This is going to look fantastic!

Definitely very interested to see if this manifests itself in the final built project (or is just an aesthetic conceit), considering that nature is inconveniently messy and ivy has some destructive properties. Would really help soften up and make the architecture less intimidating in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Sorry natureis so inconvenient for you. But it’s the other way around in reality. We are the Inconvienence to nature. But back to the project. Looks amazing. Those circular corner mirrored balls things are “neat”
 
Sorry natureis so inconvenient for you. But it’s the other way around in reality. We are the Inconvienence to nature. But back to the project. Looks amazing. Those circular corner mirrored balls things are “neat”

Well, I'm not asserting that for me, but for property managers, developers and engineers, this may very much be an incovenience.

This is why so few buildings have greenery on them (or why greenery on buildings is often 'bubbled-up' in planters and beds)- it's simply more convenient to not have to deal with nature/to tightly control it, than to deal with its unpredictable nature.
 
A project that should have been right at the waterfront

I often find myself with similar thoughts about the quixotic nature of Toronto development (and have made comments here to that effect), but I have to remind myself that architecture is not (to use an overused phrase) a zero sum gain. Having something nice in one part of town doesn't equate to a loss of something nice somewhere else. The more high quality projects that get underway here, the better chance that the bar for overall design rises a little bit higher.

The other thing to consider with this project is that it is located on a heavily used transit corridor in a high profile part of town--though maybe not quite to the level of the central waterfront--so it will be seen and appreciated by hordes of people--including tourists and the all important celebrities.

If all goes according to plan and the design doesn't get value engineered to death, it will be a huge shot in the arm for architecture aficionados , and increase the chances of BIG coming back to design more buildings here (maybe even something on the blessed waterfront--if there is still room there).
 
I often find myself with similar thoughts about the quixotic nature of Toronto development (and have made comments here to that effect), but I have to remind myself that architecture is not (to use an overused phrase) a zero sum gain. Having something nice in one part of town doesn't equate to a loss of something nice somewhere else. The more high quality projects that get underway here, the better chance that the bar for overall design rises a little bit higher.

The other thing to consider with this project is that it is located on a heavily used transit corridor in a high profile part of town--though maybe not quite to the level of the central waterfront--so it will be seen and appreciated by hordes of people--including tourists and the all important celebrities.

If all goes according to plan and the design doesn't get value engineered to death, it will be a huge shot in the arm for architecture aficionados , and increase the chances of BIG coming back to design more buildings here (maybe even something on the blessed waterfront--if there is still room there).

I think Westbank tends to sell their units at a steep enough price that they don't have to resort to value engineering, I really think this building will live up to the renders. Then again I'm a big BIG fan so maybe I'm overly optimistic
 
As much as I like this project...

1) All condominium projects are value engineered. It is almost impossible to conceive a project without value-engineering because it is essentially built in to the process.

2) BIG is not a firm known for good detailing or a material sensitivity. I don't expect the cladding or details to be highlights here; BIG is all about the massing.
 
Good turn out on opening day yesterday. Even wedding parties were getting in on the action. The free cookie dough offered next door didn't hurt either. Overall a terrific exhibit.

Big1.jpg


Big2.jpg


Big3.jpg


Big4.jpg


Big5.jpg


Big6.jpg


Big7.jpg


Big8.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Big1.jpg
    Big1.jpg
    202.9 KB · Views: 570
  • Big2.jpg
    Big2.jpg
    321.1 KB · Views: 568
  • Big3.jpg
    Big3.jpg
    367.8 KB · Views: 574
  • Big4.jpg
    Big4.jpg
    260.6 KB · Views: 563
  • Big5.jpg
    Big5.jpg
    265.9 KB · Views: 547
  • Big6.jpg
    Big6.jpg
    218.8 KB · Views: 548
  • Big7.jpg
    Big7.jpg
    267.2 KB · Views: 552
  • Big8.jpg
    Big8.jpg
    230.7 KB · Views: 547
The model is pretty amazing… but not super easy to shoot: with light reflecting off the plexiglas box that surrounds it (often more light than coming from the model itself), means that you've got to manoeuvre around quite a bit, and then do a lot of processing of what you end up with to get the features to stand out. That said, I've got 20 pics here which I'll split over two posts, the first concentrating on the development's upper levels:

DSC09342.jpg
DSC09343.jpg
DSC09347.jpg
DSC09348.jpg
DSC09351.jpg
DSC09352.jpg


It looks to me that that there will be two types of glass block used on the exterior, either that or the same block but with white, solid walls being it in places, as there are definitely translucent sections, and those that don't transmit light from the interiors.

DSC09358.jpg
DSC09360.jpg
DSC09362.jpg
DSC09364.jpg


This last shot will lead us down to street level for the next photos

42
 

Attachments

  • DSC09342.jpg
    DSC09342.jpg
    313.6 KB · Views: 534
  • DSC09343.jpg
    DSC09343.jpg
    384.7 KB · Views: 529
  • DSC09347.jpg
    DSC09347.jpg
    318.4 KB · Views: 545
  • DSC09348.jpg
    DSC09348.jpg
    305.5 KB · Views: 531
  • DSC09351.jpg
    DSC09351.jpg
    339.7 KB · Views: 503
  • DSC09352.jpg
    DSC09352.jpg
    331.7 KB · Views: 518
  • DSC09358.jpg
    DSC09358.jpg
    268.5 KB · Views: 522
  • DSC09360.jpg
    DSC09360.jpg
    272.1 KB · Views: 544
  • DSC09362.jpg
    DSC09362.jpg
    550.1 KB · Views: 519
  • DSC09364.jpg
    DSC09364.jpg
    606.4 KB · Views: 519
Now we'll spin around the building, mostly checking out the interface with King Street, the walkthrough from the new cat park to the south, and the interior courtyard space wth the crystal balls hanging above it.

DSC09344.jpg
DSC09345.jpg
DSC09346.jpg
DSC09353.jpg
DSC09354.jpg
DSC09355.jpg
DSC09357.jpg
DSC09365.jpg
DSC09366.jpg
DSC09368.jpg


…and that's the best of what I got of the model.

42
 

Attachments

  • DSC09344.jpg
    DSC09344.jpg
    394.1 KB · Views: 512
  • DSC09345.jpg
    DSC09345.jpg
    382 KB · Views: 514
  • DSC09346.jpg
    DSC09346.jpg
    402.1 KB · Views: 524
  • DSC09353.jpg
    DSC09353.jpg
    319.5 KB · Views: 481
  • DSC09354.jpg
    DSC09354.jpg
    215.6 KB · Views: 495
  • DSC09355.jpg
    DSC09355.jpg
    173.1 KB · Views: 503
  • DSC09357.jpg
    DSC09357.jpg
    180.9 KB · Views: 481
  • DSC09365.jpg
    DSC09365.jpg
    500.2 KB · Views: 493
  • DSC09366.jpg
    DSC09366.jpg
    588.4 KB · Views: 488
  • DSC09368.jpg
    DSC09368.jpg
    775.1 KB · Views: 507
The model is pretty amazing… but not super easy to shoot: with light reflecting off the plexiglas box that surrounds it
Easily solved (in camera) with a polarizing filter. Not much you can do after the fact besides dodge and burn until it's less noticeable
 

Back
Top